He Kevin D, Nguyen Linh, Norris Maxwell, Malat Gregory, Witek Stephanie, Sammons Chelsea, Forte Abigail, Claridge Tamara, Clark Jennifer Trofe, Blumberg Emily
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2025 Jan-Feb;27(1):e14410. doi: 10.1111/tid.14410. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
Despite limited data supporting use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, atovaquone and dapsone are often used as alternatives to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis.
This single-center, retrospective cohort study describes a multi-organ program's experience with alternative PJP prophylaxis. Adult SOT recipients transplanted November 13, 2020 to November 13, 2022 who received non-TMP-SMX PJP prophylaxis and had > 1 year follow-up were included.
Among 953 SOTs performed, 333 (34.9%) recipients received alternative PJP prophylaxis (319 [95.8%] atovaquone and 14 [4.2%] dapsone). Alternative prophylaxis was initiated in 76 (22.8%) recipients without starting TMP-SMX, mostly due to sulfa allergy (62, 81.6%). In 257 recipients who started TMP-SMX, common reasons for switching to alternatives were hyperkalemia (105, 40.9%) and leukopenia (77, 30.0%). While 79.8% of recipients had these adverse effects resolve, only 27.3% resumed TMP-SMX. Tolerance was high after resumption (85.7%). Barriers to accessing alternative prophylaxis included cost (25, 7.5%) and prior authorizations (26, 7.8%). There was one case of severe disseminated toxoplasmosis, one case of Nocardia infection, and no cases of PJP.
Alternative PJP prophylaxis carries risk of breakthrough infection and barriers to initiation. Since most recovered from adverse effects of TMP-SMX and tolerated resumption, providers should re-trial TMP-SMX when feasible.
尽管支持在实体器官移植(SOT)受者中使用的数据有限,但阿托伐醌和氨苯砜常被用作甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)的替代药物,用于预防耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎(PJP)。
这项单中心回顾性队列研究描述了一个多器官项目在使用替代PJP预防措施方面的经验。纳入了2020年11月13日至2022年11月13日接受非TMP-SMX PJP预防措施且随访时间超过1年的成年SOT受者。
在进行的953例SOT中,333例(34.9%)受者接受了替代PJP预防措施(319例[95.8%]使用阿托伐醌,14例[4.2%]使用氨苯砜)。76例(22.8%)受者未开始使用TMP-SMX就开始了替代预防措施,主要原因是磺胺过敏(62例,81.6%)。在257例开始使用TMP-SMX的受者中,转为使用替代药物的常见原因是高钾血症(105例,40.9%)和白细胞减少(77例,30.0%)。虽然79.8%的受者这些不良反应得到缓解,但只有27.3%的受者恢复使用TMP-SMX。恢复使用后耐受性较高(85.7%)。获得替代预防措施的障碍包括费用(25例,7.5%)和预先授权(26例,7.8%)。有1例严重播散性弓形虫病病例、1例诺卡菌感染病例,无PJP病例。
替代PJP预防措施存在突破性感染风险和启动障碍。由于大多数人从TMP-SMX的不良反应中恢复且能耐受恢复使用,提供者应在可行时重新试用TMP-SMX。