• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术援助(TA)有效性逻辑模型:一种系统规划、提供和评估 TA 的工具。

The Technical Assistance (TA) Effectiveness Logic Model: A Tool for Systematically Planning, Delivering, and Evaluating TA.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA.

American Institutes of Research, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):369-385. doi: 10.1177/01632787241285561.

DOI:10.1177/01632787241285561
Abstract

Technical assistance (TA) is a tailored approach to capacity building that has grown in use across diverse settings over the past two decades, particularly in the domains of health improvement, child welfare, youth development, and education. In practice, TA services often include a combination of activities (e.g., coaching, professional development, site visits, and resource sharing) and vary in dosage, modality, and numerous other dimensions. While tailoring to recipient needs holds significant value, the individualized nature of TA creates challenges for assessing the effectiveness of TA. The difficulty of determining what contributes to TA outcomes is amplified when TA delivery is largely reactive (rather than proactive) and unaccompanied by a systematic approach to planning, delivery, and evaluation. Logic models are a well-established tool and a straightforward way to make TA more systematic. In this article, we introduce the TA Effectiveness Logic Model as a skeletal framework to guide systematic TA planning, delivery, and evaluation. The TA Effectiveness Logic Model graphically presents the rationale and expectations for how TA works in a setting. We describe two types of TA effectiveness logic models: basic and contextual. In addition, we offer a case example from work based on a national training and TA center to illustrate both types of logic models. Lastly, we discuss practical implications of TA effectiveness logic models for TA collaborators (funders, training and TA center administrators, TA providers, TA recipients, and researchers). Routinizing the use of TA effectiveness logic models has benefits for both the science and practice of TA.

摘要

技术援助 (TA) 是一种针对能力建设的定制方法,在过去二十年中,在医疗改善、儿童福利、青年发展和教育等领域得到了广泛应用。在实践中,TA 服务通常包括一系列活动(例如,辅导、专业发展、现场访问和资源共享),并在剂量、方式和许多其他方面有所不同。虽然针对接受者的需求进行定制具有重要价值,但 TA 的个性化性质给评估 TA 的有效性带来了挑战。当 TA 的交付主要是被动的(而不是主动的)并且没有系统的规划、交付和评估方法时,确定什么因素促成 TA 结果的难度就会加大。逻辑模型是一种成熟的工具,也是使 TA 更加系统的简单方法。在本文中,我们引入了 TA 有效性逻辑模型,作为一种指导系统的 TA 规划、交付和评估的基本框架。TA 有效性逻辑模型以图形方式呈现了 TA 在特定环境中运作的原理和预期。我们描述了两种类型的 TA 有效性逻辑模型:基本型和情境型。此外,我们还提供了一个基于国家培训和 TA 中心的工作案例,来说明这两种逻辑模型。最后,我们讨论了 TA 有效性逻辑模型对 TA 合作者(资助者、培训和 TA 中心管理人员、TA 提供者、TA 接受者和研究人员)的实际意义。使 TA 有效性逻辑模型的使用常规化对 TA 的科学性和实用性都有好处。

相似文献

1
The Technical Assistance (TA) Effectiveness Logic Model: A Tool for Systematically Planning, Delivering, and Evaluating TA.技术援助(TA)有效性逻辑模型:一种系统规划、提供和评估 TA 的工具。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):369-385. doi: 10.1177/01632787241285561.
2
Technical Assistance for Systemic Change: Lessons Learned From a National Technical Assistance Center.系统性变革的技术援助:国家技术援助中心的经验教训。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):219-229. doi: 10.1177/01632787241247853.
3
Commentary: Bridging and Reducing the Gaps Between Research and Practice: Pathways to Outcomes and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation 2.0.述评:弥合研究与实践之间的差距:通向结果的途径和传播与实施的交互式系统框架 2.0。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):494-506. doi: 10.1177/01632787241299820. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
4
A Proactive, Systematic Approach to Building the Capacity of Technical Assistance Providers.主动、系统的方法来增强技术援助提供者的能力。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 May;24(3):546-559. doi: 10.1177/15248399221080096. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Adopting a Systematic, Proactive, Evidence-Informed Technical Assistance System.采用系统的、主动的、循证的技术援助系统的障碍和促进因素。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):353-368. doi: 10.1177/01632787241293756. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
6
Developing a Set of Standardized Core Principles and Methods Across Multiple Training and Technical Assistance Centers.制定一套跨多个培训和技术援助中心的标准化核心原则和方法。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Dec;47(4):420-436. doi: 10.1177/01632787241291052. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
7
A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance.技术援助评估与效果的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00314-1.
8
Technical assistance as a prevention capacity-building tool: a demonstration using the getting to outcomes framework.作为预防能力建设工具的技术援助:运用“实现成果”框架的示范
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5):810-28. doi: 10.1177/1090198108329999. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
9
Technical Assistance to Enhance Prevention Capacity: a Research Synthesis of the Evidence Base.加强预防能力的技术援助:基于证据的研究综述
Prev Sci. 2016 May;17(4):417-28. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0636-5.
10
A technical assistance program approach for pharmacist clinical services integration in primary care organizations.药师临床服务融入基层医疗组织的技术援助项目方法。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 May-Jun;63(3):952-960. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.020. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the surface of capacity building: a mixed-methods study of the core functions and forms of dissemination and implementation science consultations.超越能力建设表面:一项关于传播与实施科学咨询的核心功能及形式的混合方法研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Aug 18;6(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00775-0.
2
Beyond the Surface of Capacity Building: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Core Functions and Forms of Dissemination and Implementation Science Consultations.超越能力建设表面:一项关于传播与实施科学咨询核心功能及形式的混合方法研究
Res Sq. 2025 May 13:rs.3.rs-6559185. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6559185/v1.
3
Unpacking Technical Assistance (TA) Strategies Within a State-Level Prevention Support System: A Mixed-Method Study in Determining Types and Amount of TA.
在州级预防支持系统中解析技术援助(TA)策略:一种确定 TA 类型和数量的混合方法研究。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):204-218. doi: 10.1177/01632787241248769.