Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理、尼可地尔和曲美他嗪在对比剂诱导肾病中的作用:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning, nicorandil, and trimetazidine in contrast-induced nephropathy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen Longhua District Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2431141. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431141. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a potential complication associated with the administration of intravenous contrast agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and two pharmacological interventions in preventing CIN.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of RIPC, nicorandil, and trimetazidine in treating CIN were searched within databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN. The consistency model was used to address heterogeneity and enhance model fit. The assessment of consistency between direct and indirect evidence was conducted through the node-splitting method. Posterior probability estimates and surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) ranked interventions based on their effectiveness in preventing CIN. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used to grade the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Based on hydration therapy, RIPC, nicorandil, and trimetazidine all showed prophylactic effects on CIN compared to control groups. The SUCRA results showed that RIPC (SUCRA = 37.7%, PrBest = 0.4%), nicorandil (SUCRA = 91.2%, PrBest = 74.7%), and trimetazidine (SUCRA = 71.0%, PrBest = 24.9%). However, there were no significant differences between the nicorandil, RIPC, and trimetazidine groups. Subgroup analysis suggested that there was still a protective effect in populations with mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m or with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil, trimetazidine, and RIPC all showed renal protective effects. Based on hydration, nicorandil, trimetazidine, and RIPC may show better prophylaxis against CIN than hydration alone after intravenous contrast administration.

摘要

简介

对比剂肾病(CIN)是静脉内应用造影剂后可能出现的一种并发症。本研究旨在评估远程缺血预处理(RIPC)和两种药物干预措施预防 CIN 的效果。

方法

在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Web of Science 等数据库中检索了评估 RIPC、尼可地尔和曲美他嗪治疗 CIN 疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是 CIN 的发生率。采用一致性模型解决异质性问题,增强模型拟合度。通过节点分裂法评估直接证据和间接证据之间的一致性。根据预防 CIN 的效果,采用后验概率估计和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对干预措施进行排名。采用推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)框架对证据质量进行分级。

结果

基于水化疗法,RIPC、尼可地尔和曲美他嗪均与对照组相比对 CIN 有预防作用。SUCRA 结果显示,RIPC(SUCRA = 37.7%,PrBest = 0.4%)、尼可地尔(SUCRA = 91.2%,PrBest = 74.7%)和曲美他嗪(SUCRA = 71.0%,PrBest = 24.9%)均有预防作用。但尼可地尔、RIPC 和曲美他嗪三组之间无显著差异。亚组分析表明,在平均估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73 m 或糖尿病患病率较高的人群中,仍存在保护作用。

结论

尼可地尔、曲美他嗪和 RIPC 均有肾脏保护作用。基于水化疗法,尼可地尔、曲美他嗪和 RIPC 与单纯水化相比,在静脉内应用造影剂后可能对 CIN 有更好的预防作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c0/11610246/88ba0952ecde/IRNF_A_2431141_F0001_C.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验