Suppr超能文献

牙颌面特征和错颌畸形对面部外观不满意的影响。

The impact of dentofacial characteristics and malocclusions on dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, 1. Cad No: 107, Bahcelievler-Ankara, 06490, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 28;28(12):661. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06060-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess how, and to what extent, dentofacial features and malocclusions affect the perceived dissatisfaction with the appearance of dentofacial region in different age groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dissatisfaction with dental appearance (DDA) and facial appearance (DFA) of 430 patients were assessed using self-reported 5-point Likert scores (1: very satisfied - 5:very dissatisfied). Number of decayed, filled, and missing teeth, oral hygiene status, crowding in the upper/lower arches, molar relationship, overjet, overbite, posterior-crossbite, upper/lower midline deviations, face type, profile, nasal tip and chin deviations were assessed by an experienced orthodontist. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to determine how the examined variables affected DDA and DFA scores.

RESULTS

The median age of the 430 patients (271 female, 159 male) was 23.0 years. 60.9% of the patients had Angle Class I, 32.3% had Angle Class II, and 6.7% had Angle Class III molar relationship. According to the IOTN (DC), 37.4% of the patients had grade 4 and grade 5. Gender had no impact on DDA and DFA. Being young (teenagers OR = 4.78, CI:2.43-9.40, young adults (OR = 3.15, CI: 1.70-5.83), having poor oral hygiene (OR = 2.32, CI: 1.37-3.92), missing teeth (OR = 1.19, CI:1.10-1.29), convex profile (OR = 1.94, CI:1.03-3.67), diastema (OR = 3.18, CI:1.33-7.61), crowding in the upper arch (moderate: OR = 2.10, CI:1.30-3.68, severe: OR = 5.94, CI:3.15-11.19) affected the DDA scores negatively. Class III malocclusion (OR = 5.60, CI:1.85-16.91), decreased overbite (OR = 2.44, CI:1.21-4.89), and increase in DDA scores (OR = 1.88, CI: 1.50-2.35) all increased the DFA scores.

CONCLUSION

Certain dentofacial characteristics and age of the patients significantly affect self-reported dissatisfaction with dental and facial appearance levels, with varying degrees of severity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Awareness of the impacts of malocclusions and dentofacial features that result in patient dissatisfaction among those who apply for dental treatment at the clinic enables a deeper understanding of the patient's priorities, expectations from orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcome.

摘要

目的

评估不同年龄组的牙颌面特征和错畸形如何以及在何种程度上影响对牙颌面区域外观的不满意程度。

材料和方法

使用自我报告的 5 分李克特评分(1:非常满意-5:非常不满意)评估 430 名患者对牙齿外观(DDA)和面部外观(DFA)的不满意程度。由一位经验丰富的正畸医生评估龋齿、填充和缺失的牙齿数量、口腔卫生状况、上颌/下颌弓的拥挤程度、磨牙关系、覆颌、覆盖、后牙反颌、上颌/下颌中线偏斜、面型、侧貌、鼻尖和颏部偏斜等情况。使用有序逻辑回归分析来确定检查变量如何影响 DDA 和 DFA 评分。

结果

430 名患者(271 名女性,159 名男性)的中位年龄为 23.0 岁。60.9%的患者为安氏Ⅰ类错颌,32.3%为安氏Ⅱ类错颌,6.7%为安氏Ⅲ类错颌。根据 IOTN(DC),37.4%的患者为 4 级和 5 级。性别对 DDA 和 DFA 没有影响。年轻(青少年 OR=4.78,CI:2.43-9.40,年轻成年人 OR=3.15,CI:1.70-5.83)、口腔卫生状况差(OR=2.32,CI:1.37-3.92)、牙齿缺失(OR=1.19,CI:1.10-1.29)、凸面型(OR=1.94,CI:1.03-3.67)、间隙(OR=3.18,CI:1.33-7.61)、上颌拥挤(中度:OR=2.10,CI:1.30-3.68,重度:OR=5.94,CI:3.15-11.19)均对 DDA 评分产生负面影响。Ⅲ类错颌(OR=5.60,CI:1.85-16.91)、覆颌减少(OR=2.44,CI:1.21-4.89)和 DDA 评分增加(OR=1.88,CI:1.50-2.35)均会增加 DFA 评分。

结论

某些牙颌面特征和患者的年龄会显著影响患者对牙齿和面部外观不满意程度的自我报告,严重程度不同。

临床意义

了解导致患者在诊所就诊时对治疗不满意的错畸形和牙颌面特征的影响,可加深对患者治疗重点、对正畸治疗的期望以及对治疗结果满意度的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验