Suppr超能文献

晚期乳腺癌中CDK4/6抑制剂的早期与延迟使用

Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer.

作者信息

Sonke Gabe S, van Ommen-Nijhof Annemiek, Wortelboer Noor, van der Noort Vincent, Swinkels Astrid C P, Blommestein Hedwig M, Guerrero Paez Cristina, Mol Linda, Beeker Aart, Beelen Karin, Hamming Lisanne C, Heijns Joan B, Honkoop Aafke H, de Jong Paul C, van Rossum-Schornagel Quirine C, van Schaik-van de Mheen Christa, Tol Jolien, Tromp-van Driel Cathrien S, Vrijaldenhoven Suzan, van Leeuwen-Stok A Elise, Konings Inge R, Jager Agnes

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nature. 2024 Dec;636(8042):474-480. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08035-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and can be used early as first-line treatment or deferred to second-line treatment. Randomized data comparing the use of CDK4/6i in the first- and second-line setting are lacking. The phase 3 SONIA trial (NCT03425838) randomized 1,050 patients who had not received previous therapy for advanced breast cancer to receive CDK4/6i in the first- or second-line setting. All of the patients received the same endocrine therapy, consisting of an aromatase inhibitor for first-line treatment and fulvestrant for second-line treatment. The primary end point was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)). We observed no statistically significant benefit for the use of CDK4/6i as a first-line compared with second-line treatment (median, 31.0 versus 26.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The health-related quality of life was similar in both groups. First-line CDK4/6i use was associated with a longer CDK4/6i treatment duration compared with second-line use (median CDK4/6i treatment duration of 24.6 versus 8.1 months, respectively) and more grade ≥3 adverse events (2,763 versus 1,591, respectively). These data challenge the need for first-line use of a CDK4/6i in all patients.

摘要

细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)与内分泌治疗联合应用可改善激素受体(HR)阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的预后,可早期作为一线治疗使用,也可推迟至二线治疗。目前缺乏比较CDK4/6i在一线和二线治疗中应用的随机数据。3期SONIA试验(NCT03425838)将1050例既往未接受过晚期乳腺癌治疗的患者随机分为一线或二线接受CDK4/6i治疗。所有患者均接受相同的内分泌治疗,一线治疗采用芳香化酶抑制剂,二线治疗采用氟维司群。主要终点定义为从随机分组到二线治疗后疾病进展的时间(无进展生存期2(PFS2))。我们观察到,与二线治疗相比,一线使用CDK4/6i没有统计学上的显著益处(中位数分别为31.0个月和26.8个月;风险比=0.87;95%置信区间=0.74-1.03;P=0.10)。两组的健康相关生活质量相似。与二线使用相比,一线使用CDK4/6i的CDK4/6i治疗持续时间更长(CDK4/6i治疗持续时间中位数分别为24.6个月和8.1个月),且≥3级不良事件更多(分别为2763例和1591例)。这些数据对所有患者一线使用CDK4/6i的必要性提出了质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验