Tian Esther Jie, Martin Priya, Ingram Lewis A, Kumar Saravana
Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT in Health), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Nov 23;17:5521-5570. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S489640. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to synthesize contemporary evidence on effectiveness of community-based allied health (AH) services on acute care utilizations and views from relevant stakeholders. An a priori protocol was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42023437013]. Inclusion criteria were: (a) stand-alone interventions led by practitioners/graduates from one or more target AH professions (audiology, exercise physiology, diabetes educator, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, social work, and speech pathology); (b) examined acute care utilization-related outcomes with/without perceptions of relevant stakeholders; and (c) published after 2010 and in English. Eligible studies were identified from: (a) bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, PsycINFO, CINAHL complete, and the Cochrane Library) (September 19, 2023); (b) online databases (ProQuest Central and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) and theses repository (Trove) (September 20, 2023); (c) Google and Google Scholar (October 17-18, 2023); and (d) citation searching. A modified version of McMaster Critical Appraisal Tools and McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to assess methodological quality. Data synthesis was through convergent segregated approach. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. There were 67 included papers. The integrated quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrated mixed evidence, likely influenced by the heterogeneity of the evidence base, for the effectiveness of AH services on acute care utilizations. Patients and their carers were largely positive about these services, highlighting opportunities to build on these experiences. The certainty of evidence for patient-important outcomes was however "very low", emphasizing cautious interpretation. The findings of this review shed light on the breadth and scope of AH in the community sector, and its potential impact on the acute sector. Further investment in, and ongoing research on, community-based AH can strengthen primary healthcare and relieve pressure on the acute sector.
这项混合方法系统评价的目的是综合关于社区联合健康(AH)服务对急性护理利用的有效性的当代证据以及相关利益相关者的观点。一项预先制定的方案已在国际系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)[CRD42023437013]上登记。纳入标准为:(a)由来自一个或多个目标AH专业(听力学、运动生理学、糖尿病教育者、营养与饮食学、职业治疗、物理治疗、足病学、心理学、社会工作和言语病理学)的从业者/毕业生主导的独立干预措施;(b)考察了有无相关利益相关者看法的与急性护理利用相关的结果;(c)2010年以后发表且为英文。通过以下途径识别符合条件的研究:(a)书目数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、EmCare、PsycINFO、CINAHL complete和Cochrane图书馆)(2023年9月19日);(b)在线数据库(ProQuest Central和ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global)以及论文库(Trove)(2023年9月20日);(c)谷歌和谷歌学术(2023年10月17 - 18日);以及(d)引文检索。使用麦克马斯特批判性评价工具的修改版和麦吉尔混合方法评价工具来评估方法学质量。数据综合采用收敛性分离法。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)来评估证据的确定性。纳入了67篇论文。综合的定量和定性研究结果表明,关于AH服务对急性护理利用有效性的证据好坏参半,这可能受到证据基础异质性的影响。患者及其护理人员对这些服务大多持积极态度,突出了基于这些经验进一步发展的机会。然而,对患者重要结局的证据确定性为“非常低”,这强调了解释时要谨慎。本评价的结果揭示了社区部门中AH的广度和范围及其对急性部门的潜在影响。对基于社区的AH的进一步投资和持续研究可以加强初级医疗保健并减轻急性部门的压力。