Kho Pik Fang, Wary Neil, Zanetti Daniela, Abbasi Fahim, Knowles Joshua W, Panyard Daniel J, Watson Katie T, Stell Laurel, Lazzeroni Laura C, Gustafsson Stefan, Lind Lars, Petrie John R, Assimes Themistocles L
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA.
medRxiv. 2024 Nov 12:2024.11.09.24317011. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.09.24317011.
We previously reported significant correlations between a direct measure of insulin sensitivity (IS) and blood levels of proteins measured using the Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) in two European cohorts. However, protein correlations with IS within non-European populations, in response to short-term interventions that improve IS, and any causal associations with IS have not yet been established.
We measured 1,470 proteins using the PEA in the plasma of 1,015 research participants at Stanford University who underwent one or more direct measures of IS. Association analyses were carried out with multivariable linear regression within and across Stanford subgroups and within each of the two European cohorts. Association statistics were also meta-analyzed after transformation and harmonization of the two direct measures of IS. Lastly, we performed genome-wide association studies of IS and used genetic instruments of plasma proteins from the UK Biobank to identify candidate causal proteins for IS through Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis.
In age and sex adjusted model, 810 proteins were associated with baseline IS among 652 self-reported European participants in the Stanford cohort at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. Effect sizes for these proteins were highly correlated with those observed in 122 South Asian, 92 East Asian, 85 Hispanic, and 52 Black/African American persons (r= 0.68 to 0.83, all P≤4.3×10). Meta-analysis of the full Stanford cohort with the two European cohorts (N=2,945) yielded 247 significant protein associations (FDR < 0.05), with 75 remaining significant after further adjustment for body mass index. In a subset of Stanford participants undergoing insulin sensitizing interventions (N=53 taking thiazolidinediones, N=66 with weight loss), 79.6% of protein level changes were directionally consistent with the respective baseline association (observed/expected p=6.7×10). MR analyses identified eight candidate causal proteins for IS, among which were SELE and ASGR1, proteins with established drug targets currently under investigation.
Plasma proteins measured using the PEA provide a robust signature for IS across diverse populations and after short-term insulin sensitizing interventions highlighting their potential value as universal biomarkers of insulin resistance. A small subset of markers provided insights into potential causal molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.
我们之前报道了在两个欧洲队列中,胰岛素敏感性(IS)的直接测量值与使用邻位延伸分析(PEA)测量的血液蛋白质水平之间存在显著相关性。然而,在非欧洲人群中,蛋白质与IS的相关性、对改善IS的短期干预措施的反应以及与IS的任何因果关联尚未确定。
我们在斯坦福大学的1015名研究参与者的血浆中使用PEA测量了1470种蛋白质,这些参与者接受了一项或多项IS的直接测量。在斯坦福亚组内部和之间以及两个欧洲队列中的每一个队列内部,使用多变量线性回归进行关联分析。在对IS的两种直接测量进行转换和协调后,还对关联统计进行了荟萃分析。最后,我们进行了IS的全基因组关联研究,并使用来自英国生物银行的血浆蛋白遗传工具,通过孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来确定IS的候选因果蛋白。
在年龄和性别调整模型中,斯坦福队列中652名自我报告的欧洲参与者中,810种蛋白质与基线IS相关,错误发现率(FDR)<0.05。这些蛋白质的效应大小与在122名南亚人、92名东亚人、85名西班牙裔人和52名黑人/非裔美国人中观察到的效应大小高度相关(r = 0.68至0.83,所有P≤4.3×10)。对整个斯坦福队列与两个欧洲队列(N = 2945)进行的荟萃分析产生了247个显著的蛋白质关联(FDR < 0.05),在进一步调整体重指数后,仍有75个关联显著。在接受胰岛素增敏干预的斯坦福参与者亚组中(N = 53服用噻唑烷二酮类药物,N = 66体重减轻),79.6%的蛋白质水平变化在方向上与各自的基线关联一致(观察到的/预期的p = 6.7×10)。MR分析确定了8种IS的候选因果蛋白,其中包括SELE和ASGR1,这两种蛋白具有目前正在研究的既定药物靶点。
使用PEA测量的血浆蛋白为不同人群以及短期胰岛素增敏干预后的IS提供了一个强大的特征,突出了它们作为胰岛素抵抗通用生物标志物的潜在价值。一小部分标志物为潜在的因果分子机制和治疗靶点提供了见解。