Suppr超能文献

使用AGREE II工具对不同收入水平地区高血压指南质量的差异进行评估。

An assessment of variation in quality of hypertension guidelines across income settings using the AGREE II tool.

作者信息

Philip Richu, Janssen Carolina, Jose Arun, Beaney Thomas, Clarke Jonathan

机构信息

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, UK.

Imperial College London Department of Primary Care and Public Health, London, England, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Sep 17;9:526. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22699.1. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension affects over one billion people worldwide, posing a significant global health burden. Clinical practice guidelines could play a key role in guiding healthcare providers in improving hypertension management. However, how the quality of hypertension CPGs differs across country income settings is not well understood. This study aims to explore variation in the quality of hypertension CPGs, comparing low-, middle-, and high-income countries, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

METHODS

A Medline and grey literature search was conducted to identify hypertension CPGs in English from every country from January 2012 to September 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed and scored each CPG against the AGREE II tool. Results were described and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for statistically significant difference in the domain scores across country income groups.

RESULTS

Forty-three CPGs were included for analysis from across income settings. Guidelines from HICs scored higher in four out of the six domains. The highest scoring domain was 4: "clarity and presentation" (median score 83%), the lowest scoring was domain 6 "editorial independence" (median score 0%). Statistically significant differences between income settings were observed for domain 3 "rigour of development" (p <0.001), domain 4 "clarity and presentation" (p = 0.03) and domain 6 "editorial independence" (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst some variation exists in guideline quality across country income levels, the greatest degree of variation exists across the domains of the AGREE II tool. Global efforts to improve the quality of hypertension guidelines should focus on the transparent statement of editorial independence of guideline committees and apply rigorous replicable methods in the authoring of guidelines. Establishing national and international communities of practice to collaborate across income settings may reduce duplication of resource, allow for shared learning and promote the development of high-quality hypertension CPGs.

摘要

背景

高血压影响着全球超过10亿人,构成了重大的全球健康负担。临床实践指南在指导医疗服务提供者改善高血压管理方面可发挥关键作用。然而,高血压临床实践指南的质量在不同国家收入水平之间的差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在使用《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II工具,探索高血压临床实践指南质量的差异,比较低收入、中等收入和高收入国家。

方法

进行了Medline和灰色文献检索,以识别2012年1月至2022年9月期间来自每个国家的英文高血压临床实践指南。两名评审员根据AGREE II工具对每个临床实践指南进行独立评估和评分。描述了结果,并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来检验不同国家收入组在领域得分上的统计学显著差异。

结果

纳入了来自不同收入水平的43份临床实践指南进行分析。高收入国家的指南在六个领域中的四个领域得分更高。得分最高的领域是4:“清晰性和呈现”(中位数得分83%),得分最低的是领域6“编辑独立性”(中位数得分0%)。在领域3“制定的严谨性”(p<0.001)、领域4“清晰性和呈现”(p = 0.03)和领域6“编辑独立性”(p = 0.04)方面,观察到收入水平之间存在统计学显著差异。

结论

虽然不同国家收入水平的指南质量存在一些差异,但AGREE II工具各领域之间的差异程度最大。全球提高高血压指南质量的努力应侧重于明确指南委员会的编辑独立性声明,并在指南编写中应用严格可重复的方法。建立国家和国际实践社区,在不同收入水平之间开展合作,可能会减少资源重复,促进共同学习,并推动高质量高血压临床实践指南的制定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验