Suppr超能文献

高血压临床实践指南的差异:全球比较。

Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Helix Centre for Design in Healthcare, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2021 May 12;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01963-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the largest single contributor to the global burden of disease, affecting an estimated 1.39 billion people worldwide. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can aid in the effective management of this common condition, however, inconsistencies exist between CPGs, and the extent of this is unknown. Understanding the differences in CPG recommendations across income settings may provide an important means of understanding some of the global variations in clinical outcomes related to hypertension.

AIMS

This study aims to analyse the variation between hypertension CPGs globally. It aims to assess the variation in three areas: diagnostic threshold and staging, treatment and target blood pressure (BP) recommendations in hypertension.

METHODS

A search was conducted on the MEDLINE repository to identify national and international hypertension CPGs from 2010 to May 2020. An additional country-specific grey-literature search was conducted for all countries and territories of the world as identified by the World Bank. Data describing the diagnosis, staging, treatment and target blood pressure were extracted from CPGs, and variations between CPGs for these domains were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight CPGs from across all World Bank income settings were selected for analysis. Ninety-six per cent of guidelines defined hypertension as a clinic-based BP of ≥140/90 mmHg, and 87% of guidelines recommended a target BP of < 140/90 mmHg. In the pharmacological treatment of hypertension, eight different first-step, 17 different second-step and six different third-step drug recommendations were observed. Low-income countries preferentially recommended diuretics (63%) in the first-step treatment, whilst high-income countries offered more choice between antihypertensive classes. Forty-four per cent of guidelines, of which 71% were from higher-income contexts recommended initiating treatment with dual-drug therapy at BP 160/100 mmHg or higher.

CONCLUSION

This study found that CPGs remained largely consistent in the definition, staging and target BP recommendations for hypertension. Extensive variation was observed in treatment recommendations, particularly for second-line therapy. Variation existed between income settings; low-income countries prescribed cheaper drugs, offered less clinician choice in medications and initiated dual therapy at later stages than higher-income countries. Future research exploring the underlying drivers of this variation may improve outcomes for hypertensive patients across clinical contexts.

摘要

背景

高血压是全球疾病负担的最大单一因素,全球约有 13.9 亿人受到影响。临床实践指南(CPG)可以帮助有效管理这种常见疾病,然而,CPG 之间存在不一致,其程度尚不清楚。了解不同收入水平之间 CPG 建议的差异,可能是了解与高血压相关的临床结果全球差异的重要手段。

目的

本研究旨在分析全球高血压 CPG 之间的差异。旨在评估三个方面的差异:诊断阈值和分期、治疗和高血压目标血压(BP)建议。

方法

在 MEDLINE 数据库中进行了搜索,以确定 2010 年至 2020 年 5 月期间来自各国和国际的高血压 CPG。还对世界银行确定的所有国家和地区进行了额外的国家特定灰色文献搜索。从 CPG 中提取描述诊断、分期、治疗和目标血压的数据,并分析这些领域 CPG 之间的差异。

结果

选择了来自所有世界银行收入水平的 48 份 CPG 进行分析。96%的指南将高血压定义为诊所基于血压≥140/90mmHg,87%的指南建议目标血压<140/90mmHg。在高血压的药物治疗中,观察到 8 种不同的一线药物、17 种不同的二线药物和 6 种不同的三线药物推荐。低收入国家优先在一线治疗中推荐利尿剂(63%),而高收入国家则在降压药类之间提供更多选择。44%的指南,其中 71%来自高收入环境,建议在血压 160/100mmHg 或更高时开始双联药物治疗。

结论

本研究发现,CPG 在高血压的定义、分期和目标 BP 建议方面基本保持一致。在治疗建议方面观察到广泛的差异,特别是二线治疗。收入水平之间存在差异;低收入国家开出更便宜的药物,在药物选择方面为临床医生提供的选择较少,并且比高收入国家在更晚的阶段开始双联治疗。未来探索这种差异背后的驱动因素的研究可能会改善不同临床环境中高血压患者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6687/8114719/15f4e268d1ac/12916_2021_1963_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验