• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密苏里州圣路易斯县家长、学校护士和儿科医生对疫苗犹豫问题的看法。

Perspectives of Parents, School Nurses, and Pediatricians on Vaccine Hesitancy in St Louis County, Missouri.

作者信息

Bradshaw Jennifer, Brzozowski Amanda, Katti Priya, Chapman Olivia, Pham Audrey, Torgerson Andrew, Wankum Ethan, Snavely Aimee, Baskin Carole R

机构信息

Saint Louis County Department of Public Health, Berkeley, MO, USA.

College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2024 Nov 28:333549241297685. doi: 10.1177/00333549241297685.

DOI:10.1177/00333549241297685
PMID:39606923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11605698/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To gather perspectives on childhood vaccination and vaccine hesitancy, the Saint Louis County Department of Public Health (DPH) surveyed parents seeking nonmedical exemptions, conducted focus groups of school nurses, and interviewed pediatricians.

METHODS

We distributed exemption forms and voluntary questionnaires to parents in St Louis County who were seeking nonmedical exemptions for their school-aged children at any DPH clinic from August 2019 through December 2022. We conducted and recorded four 75- to 90-minute focus groups of 11 school nurses in groups of 2 or 3 nurses in September 2022. We conducted and recorded interviews of 8 pediatricians in March 2023. We calculated descriptive statistics, transcribed focus group discussions and interviews, and performed qualitative coding.

RESULTS

We collected 1871 exemption forms. The median age of children (n = 1854) was 6 years. Of the 10 vaccines included in the exemption list, the percentage of exclusions ranged from 91.2% for meningococcal conjugate to 88.7% for hepatitis A. We identified 4 themes in the focus groups: recent changes in vaccine compliance, hesitancy and barriers, services addressing hesitancy and barriers, and future requests for DPH. Analysis of pediatrician interviews revealed themes relating to vaccine information, community efforts, and physician decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach to vaccine hesitancy in St Louis County. Future interventions need to focus on beliefs and behavioral change related to vaccines and not just the economics and accessibility of vaccines.

摘要

目的

为了收集关于儿童疫苗接种和疫苗犹豫的观点,圣路易斯县公共卫生部(DPH)对寻求非医学豁免的家长进行了调查,组织了学校护士焦点小组,并采访了儿科医生。

方法

2019年8月至2022年12月期间,我们在圣路易斯县向在任何DPH诊所为其学龄儿童寻求非医学豁免的家长分发了豁免表格和自愿问卷。2022年9月,我们组织并记录了4个由11名学校护士参加的75至90分钟的焦点小组,每组2至3名护士。2023年3月,我们对8名儿科医生进行了采访并记录。我们计算了描述性统计数据,转录了焦点小组讨论和采访内容,并进行了定性编码。

结果

我们收集了1871份豁免表格。儿童(n = 1854)的中位年龄为6岁。在豁免清单中的10种疫苗中,排除率从脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗的91.2%到甲型肝炎疫苗的88.7%不等。我们在焦点小组中确定了4个主题:疫苗依从性的近期变化、犹豫和障碍、解决犹豫和障碍的服务以及对DPH的未来要求。对儿科医生采访的分析揭示了与疫苗信息、社区努力和医生决策相关的主题。

结论

本研究强调了在圣路易斯县采取多学科方法应对疫苗犹豫的必要性。未来的干预措施需要关注与疫苗相关的信念和行为改变,而不仅仅是疫苗的经济性和可及性。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Parents, School Nurses, and Pediatricians on Vaccine Hesitancy in St Louis County, Missouri.密苏里州圣路易斯县家长、学校护士和儿科医生对疫苗犹豫问题的看法。
Public Health Rep. 2024 Nov 28:333549241297685. doi: 10.1177/00333549241297685.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.学校护士及工作人员的知识、态度和信念以及与非医疗免疫豁免的关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e552-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e552.
3
The 2016 California policy to eliminate nonmedical vaccine exemptions and changes in vaccine coverage: An empirical policy analysis.2016 年加州消除非医学疫苗豁免政策及疫苗接种覆盖率变化:一项实证政策分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 23;16(12):e1002994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002994. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Vaccine exemption requirements and parental vaccine attitudes: an online experiment.疫苗豁免要求和家长的疫苗态度:一项在线实验。
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 4;38(11):2620-2625. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.035. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
School Vaccine Coverage and Medical Exemption Uptake After the New York State Repeal of Nonmedical Vaccination Exemptions.纽约州废除非医学疫苗豁免后,学校疫苗接种覆盖率和医学豁免率上升。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54710.
6
Pediatricians' perspectives on COVID-19 and HPV vaccine hesitancy.儿科医生对 COVID-19 和 HPV 疫苗犹豫的看法。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug 1;19(2):2225388. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2225388.
7
Development of Promising Interventions to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in a School-Based Program in Quebec, Canada: Results From a Formative Evaluation Using a Mixed Methods Design.加拿大魁北克省一项基于学校项目中改善人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的有效干预措施的开发:采用混合方法设计的形成性评估结果
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 8;8:e57118. doi: 10.2196/57118.
8
School-level perceptions and enforcement of the elimination of nonmedical exemptions to vaccination in California.加利福尼亚州学校层面对于取消疫苗接种非医学豁免的认知与执行情况。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jul 3;17(7):1986-1993. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1857202. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
9
Methods of Current Practice: Qualitative Analysis of Intervention Strategies Utilized by Vaccine Waiver Educators in Michigan.当前实践方法:对密歇根州疫苗豁免教育者所采用的干预策略进行定性分析。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 Nov;23(4):249-258. doi: 10.1177/15271544221114293. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
10
Exploring California's new law eliminating personal belief exemptions to childhood vaccines and vaccine decision-making among homeschooling mothers in California.探讨加利福尼亚州新法律对儿童疫苗的个人信仰豁免的影响,以及加利福尼亚州 homeschooling 母亲在疫苗决策方面的情况。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 29;37(5):742-750. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Coverage with Selected Vaccines and Exemption from School Vaccine Requirements Among Children in Kindergarten - United States, 2022-23 School Year.幼儿园儿童的疫苗接种覆盖情况和学校疫苗要求豁免情况 - 美国,2022-23 学年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Nov 10;72(45):1217-1224. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7245a2.
2
Healthcare providers' practice protocols, strategies, and needed tools to address parental HPV vaccine hesitancy: An exploratory study.医疗保健提供者解决父母 HPV 疫苗犹豫的实践方案、策略和所需工具:一项探索性研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2136862. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2136862. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
In Their Own Words: Resources Needed by School Nurses to Facilitate Student Immunization Compliance.学生免疫接种遵从性:校护需要的资源。
J Sch Health. 2021 Mar;91(3):218-226. doi: 10.1111/josh.12993. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
4
Physicians' decision processes about the HPV vaccine: A qualitative study.医生对 HPV 疫苗的决策过程:一项定性研究。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 15;39(3):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.019. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Addressing Parental Vaccine Hesitancy towards Childhood Vaccines in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review of Communication Interventions and Strategies.解决美国父母对儿童疫苗的犹豫态度:关于沟通干预措施和策略的系统文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Oct 8;8(4):590. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040590.
6
Vaccines and routine immunization strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的疫苗和常规免疫策略。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Feb 1;17(2):400-407. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1804776. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
7
Challenges facing vaccinators in the 21 century: results from a focus group qualitative study.21 世纪疫苗接种者面临的挑战:一项焦点小组定性研究的结果。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(12):2806-2815. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1621147. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
The Anti-vaccination Movement: A Regression in Modern Medicine.反疫苗运动:现代医学的一种倒退。
Cureus. 2018 Jul 3;10(7):e2919. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2919.
9
Vaccine Hesitancy in Pediatric Primary Care Practices.儿科初级保健中疫苗犹豫的现象。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Nov;28(13):2071-2080. doi: 10.1177/1049732318782164. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Pediatricians and Public Health: Optimizing the Health and Well-Being of the Nation's Children.儿科医生与公共卫生:优化国家儿童健康与福祉
Pediatrics. 2018 Feb;141(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3848. Epub 2018 Jan 22.