Adjunct Professor, Nursing School, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA), Brazil.
Education Manager, Proz Educação, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2024 Nov 22;142(6):e2023409. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0409.R1.05062024. eCollection 2024.
Temperature fluctuations are critical indicators of a patient's condition in intensive care units (ICUs). While invasive methods offer a more reliable measurement of core temperature, they carry greater risks of complications, limiting their use in most situations. This underscores the need for research evaluating the reliability of non-invasive temperature monitoring methods.
This study aimed to assess the accuracy and precision of four non-invasive temperature measurement techniques compared to pulmonary artery temperature, considered the gold standard.
We conducted a cross-sectional clinical study with repeated measures in the ICUs at Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
All patients admitted with a pulmonary artery catheter were included. We simultaneously recorded temperatures from the pulmonary artery, axillary area, oral cavity, temporal artery, and tympanic membrane. Bland-Altman plots were employed to assess the agreement between the different temperature measurements.
A total of 48 patients participated, with a mean age of 54 years. Females comprised 66.67% of the sample. Compared to pulmonary artery temperature, the accuracy and precision (mean and standard deviation) of the non-invasive methods were: axillary (-0.42°C, 0.59°C), oral (-0.30°C, 0.37°C), tympanic membrane (-0.21°C, 0.44°C), and temporal artery (-0.25°C, 0.61°C). Notably, in patients with abnormal body temperature (non-normothermic), only oral and tympanic membrane methods maintained their accuracy and precision.
The non-invasive thermometers evaluated in this study demonstrated acceptable accuracy and precision (within the clinically relevant threshold of 0.5°C) compared to pulmonary artery temperature. Among the non-invasive methods, the tympanic membrane measurement proved to be the most reliable, followed by the oral method.
温度波动是重症监护病房(ICU)患者病情的关键指标。虽然有创方法能更可靠地测量核心体温,但它们存在更大的并发症风险,这限制了它们在大多数情况下的使用。这凸显了研究评估非侵入性体温监测方法可靠性的必要性。
本研究旨在评估与肺动脉温度(金标准)相比,四种非侵入性体温测量技术的准确性和精密度。
我们在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学临床医院和贝洛奥里藏特费利西奥·罗乔医院的 ICU 中进行了一项横截面临床研究,采用重复测量。
所有纳入的肺动脉导管置入患者都进行了研究。我们同时记录了肺动脉、腋窝、口腔、颞动脉和鼓膜的温度。采用 Bland-Altman 图评估不同温度测量之间的一致性。
共有 48 名患者参与了研究,平均年龄为 54 岁。女性占样本的 66.67%。与肺动脉温度相比,非侵入性方法的准确性和精密度(平均值和标准差)为:腋窝(-0.42°C,0.59°C)、口腔(-0.30°C,0.37°C)、鼓膜(-0.21°C,0.44°C)和颞动脉(-0.25°C,0.61°C)。值得注意的是,在体温异常(非体温正常)的患者中,只有口腔和鼓膜方法保持了准确性和精密度。
与肺动脉温度相比,本研究评估的非侵入式温度计具有可接受的准确性和精密度(在临床相关的 0.5°C 阈值内)。在非侵入性方法中,鼓膜测量法最可靠,其次是口腔法。