• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人健康错误信息的患病率及干预策略:一项荟萃分析。

Prevalence and intervention strategies of health misinformation among older adults: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hu Bo, Liu Xinjie, Lu Chang, Ju Xingda

机构信息

Nanjing University, China.

Northeast Normal University, China.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;30(7):1427-1443. doi: 10.1177/13591053241298362. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1177/13591053241298362
PMID:39607815
Abstract

The rapid expansion of the Internet and social media has intensified the spread of health misinformation, posing significant risks, especially for older adults. This meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on the prevalence and interventions of health misinformation among older adults. Our findings reveal a high prevalence rate of 47% (95% CI [33%, 60%]), surpassing recent estimates. Offline research settings have a higher prevalence of health misinformation. Despite methodological variances, the prevalence remains consistent across different measures and development levels. Interventions show significant effectiveness (Hedges'  = 0.76, 95% CI [0.25, 1.26]), with graphic-based approaches outperforming video-based ones. These results underscore the urgent need for tailored, large-scale interventions to mitigate the adverse impacts of health misinformation on older adults. Further research should focus on refining intervention strategies and extending studies to underrepresented regions and populations.

摘要

互联网和社交媒体的迅速扩张加剧了健康错误信息的传播,带来了重大风险,尤其是对老年人而言。这项荟萃分析综合了有关老年人健康错误信息的流行情况和干预措施的证据。我们的研究结果显示,其流行率高达47%(95%置信区间[33%,60%]),超过了近期的估计。线下研究环境中健康错误信息的流行率更高。尽管存在方法上的差异,但在不同的测量方法和发展水平中,流行率保持一致。干预措施显示出显著效果(赫奇斯效应量=0.76,95%置信区间[0.25,1.26]),基于图形的方法比基于视频的方法表现更好。这些结果强调了迫切需要采取针对性的大规模干预措施,以减轻健康错误信息对老年人的不利影响。进一步的研究应侧重于完善干预策略,并将研究扩展到代表性不足的地区和人群。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and intervention strategies of health misinformation among older adults: A meta-analysis.老年人健康错误信息的患病率及干预策略:一项荟萃分析。
J Health Psychol. 2025 Jun;30(7):1427-1443. doi: 10.1177/13591053241298362. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:快速综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367.
3
Evaluating Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Older Adults With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.评估移动健康应用程序对老年糖尿病患者的有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 17;27:e65855. doi: 10.2196/65855.
4
Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.非药物干预对社区居住老年人孤独感的影响:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和元回归。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Aug;144:104524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104524. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
7
Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症成年患者的早期姑息治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD011129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011129.pub2.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
How the General Public Navigates Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Study of Identification and Response Approaches.公众如何在社交媒体上应对健康错误信息:识别与应对方法的定性研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 24;5:e67464. doi: 10.2196/67464.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How the General Public Navigates Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Study of Identification and Response Approaches.公众如何在社交媒体上应对健康错误信息:识别与应对方法的定性研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 24;5:e67464. doi: 10.2196/67464.
2
How does removing menthol tobacco product displays at point-of-sale affect adolescents' cigarette smoking intentions? The mediating effects of social norms.在销售点移除薄荷醇烟草产品展示如何影响青少年的吸烟意愿?社会规范的中介作用。
J Behav Med. 2025 Jun;48(3):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00551-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.