Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Plus Mitral Valve Plasty May Not Provide More Advantage in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) and of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) plus mitral valve plasty (MVP) in treating coronary heart disease with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation to find a better surgical method.

METHODS

Clinical data of 822 patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into the OPCABG and CABG+MVP groups according to surgical methods. Baseline data of both groups were corrected, and clinical efficacy of the two surgical methods was analyzed and compared using the propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the use of mammary artery grafts, number of grafts, and blood product consumption between the two groups (P>0.05) after IPTW. However, the CABG+MVP group had a significantly longer operation time than the OPCABG group (4.13 ± 0.85 hours vs. 5.65 ± 1.02 hours, P<0.001). No statistically significant differences in postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were observed between the two groups. However, the intra-aortic balloon pump rate was higher in the CABG+MVP group than in the OPCABG group (12.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.012). Although CABG+MVP can improve ischemic mitral regurgitation significantly (95.4% vs. 81.2%, P<0.001), there were no significant differences in the cumulative survival rate and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the groups (P>0.05) after IPTW.

CONCLUSION

CABG+MVP may not provide more advantage in patients with coronary heart disease and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation.