• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康干预措施对首发精神病患者非正规家庭照顾者的影响:用户体验和有效性的系统评价。

Digital Health Interventions for Informal Family Caregivers of People With First-Episode Psychosis: Systematic Review on User Experience and Effectiveness.

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 28;11:e63743. doi: 10.2196/63743.

DOI:10.2196/63743
Abstract

BACKGROUND

First-episode psychosis (FEP) imposes a substantial burden not only on the individual affected but also on their families. Given that FEP usually occurs during adolescence, families overtake a big part of informal care. Early family interventions, especially psychoeducation, are crucial for informal family caregivers to best support the recovery of their loved one with FEP and to reduce the risk of a psychotic relapse as much as possible, but also to avoid chronic stress within the family due to the burden of care. Digital health interventions offer the possibility to access help quicker, use less resources, and improve informal family caregiver outcomes, for example, by reducing stress and improving caregiver quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically identify studies on digital health interventions for informal family caregivers of people with FEP and to describe and synthesize the available literature on user experience, as well as the effectiveness of such digital applications on the clinical outcomes, consisting of (1) perceived caregiver stress, (2) expressed emotion, and (3) parental self-efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out across 4 electronic databases. In addition, reference lists of relevant studies were hand-searched. This review aimed to include only primary studies on informal family caregivers, who had to care for a person with FEP between 15 years and 40 years of age and a diagnosis of FEP with onset of observed symptoms within the past 5 years. All types of digital interventions were included. This systematic review is aligned with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

The search identified 7 studies that reported on user experience or effectiveness of digital health interventions on perceived caregiver stress, expressed emotion, and parental self-efficacy, including 377 informal family FEP caregivers across trials. Digital health interventions-web-based, videoconferences, and mHealth-were well accepted and perceived as relevant, easy to use, and helpful by informal family FEP caregivers. Psychoeducational content was rated as the most important across studies. Perceived caregiver stress, expressed emotion, and parental self-efficacy improved in all studies that reported on these clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that digital health interventions aimed at informal family caregivers of individuals with FEP can improve relevant clinical outcomes, with participants reporting a positive user experience. However, for some interventions reviewed, specialized in-person family care outperformed the digital intervention and partially led to better results in perceived caregiver stress and parental self-efficacy. Therefore, while digital interventions present a promising approach to alleviate the burden of care and improve informal family FEP caregiver outcomes, more studies with well-powered experimental designs are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of such applications in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024536715; https://tinyurl.com/bdd3u7v9.

摘要

背景

首发精神病(FEP)不仅给患者个人带来了巨大的负担,也给他们的家庭带来了巨大的负担。鉴于 FEP 通常发生在青少年时期,家庭承担了大部分非正式护理。早期的家庭干预措施,特别是心理教育,对于非正式家庭照顾者来说至关重要,因为这有助于他们最好地支持患有 FEP 的亲人康复,并尽可能降低精神病复发的风险,同时也避免因照顾负担而导致家庭长期承受慢性压力。数字健康干预措施提供了更快获得帮助、使用更少资源和改善非正式家庭照顾者结果的可能性,例如,通过减轻压力和提高照顾者的生活质量。

目的

本研究旨在系统地确定针对 FEP 患者非正式家庭照顾者的数字健康干预措施研究,并描述和综合现有文献中关于用户体验的信息,以及此类数字应用在临床结果方面的有效性,包括(1)照顾者感知压力,(2)表达的情感,和(3)父母自我效能感。

方法

对 4 个电子数据库进行了系统搜索。此外,还对相关研究的参考文献进行了手工搜索。本综述旨在仅纳入针对非正式家庭照顾者的原始研究,这些照顾者必须照顾年龄在 15 岁至 40 岁之间且发病症状在过去 5 年内观察到的 FEP 患者。纳入了所有类型的数字干预措施。本系统综述符合 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)2020 指南。

结果

搜索共确定了 7 项研究,这些研究报告了数字健康干预措施对照顾者感知压力、表达的情感和父母自我效能感的影响,包括 377 名接受 FEP 治疗的非正式家庭照顾者。数字健康干预措施(基于网络的、视频会议和移动健康)得到了非正式家庭 FEP 照顾者的广泛接受和认可,他们认为这些干预措施相关、易于使用且对他们有帮助。心理教育内容在所有研究中均被评为最重要的内容。所有报告这些临床结果的研究都表明,照顾者感知压力、表达的情感和父母自我效能感得到了改善。

结论

本综述的结果表明,针对 FEP 患者非正式家庭照顾者的数字健康干预措施可以改善相关的临床结果,参与者报告了积极的用户体验。然而,对于一些经过审查的干预措施,专门的家庭护理效果优于数字干预措施,并且在照顾者感知压力和父母自我效能感方面部分导致了更好的结果。因此,虽然数字干预措施为减轻照顾负担和改善非正式家庭 FEP 照顾者的结果提供了有前途的方法,但需要更多具有强大实验设计的研究来进一步调查此类应用在该人群中的有效性。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42024536715;https://tinyurl.com/bdd3u7v9。

相似文献

1
Digital Health Interventions for Informal Family Caregivers of People With First-Episode Psychosis: Systematic Review on User Experience and Effectiveness.数字健康干预措施对首发精神病患者非正规家庭照顾者的影响:用户体验和有效性的系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 28;11:e63743. doi: 10.2196/63743.
2
Effectiveness of family interventions on psychological distress and expressed emotion in family members of individuals diagnosed with first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.家庭干预对首次发作精神病患者家庭成员心理困扰和情感表达的有效性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):1057-1079. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003361.
3
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
4
[Specialised first-episode psychosis services: a systematic review of the literature].[专科首发精神病服务:文献系统综述]
Encephale. 2011 May;37 Suppl 1:S66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
7
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.早期精神病干预措施的比较:一项系统评价与成分网络荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102537. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.更易获取的数字心理健康服务概述与建议。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Feb;1(2):87-100. doi: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
Internet-based psychoeducation and support programme for relatives of young people with early psychosis: results of the first German-language intervention.
针对早期精神病青年患者亲属的基于互联网的心理教育与支持项目:首个德语干预措施的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 16;15:1248526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1248526. eCollection 2024.
4
User-Centered Development of Bolster, an mHealth Intervention for Early Psychosis Caregivers: Needs Assessment, Prototyping, and Field Trial.以用户为中心开发Bolster,一种针对早期精神病患者照顾者的移动健康干预措施:需求评估、原型设计和现场试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Nov 30;10:e50522. doi: 10.2196/50522.
5
Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员使用数字健康技术的障碍与促进因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 18;6(1):161. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4.
6
Moderated Online Social Therapy for Carers of Early Psychosis Clients in Real-World Settings: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.现实环境中针对早期精神病患者照料者的在线社交适度治疗:整群随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Sep 6;10:e47722. doi: 10.2196/47722.
7
A randomized controlled trial of moderated online social therapy for family carers of first-episode psychosis patients in a specialist treatment setting.在专业治疗环境中,针对首发精神病患者家庭照料者的适度在线社交疗法的随机对照试验。
Schizophr Res. 2023 May;255:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
First episode psychosis and beyond: much progress made but much more needed.首发精神病及以后:取得很大进展,但仍需更多努力。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04639-6.
9
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
10
Digital health interventions for non-communicable disease management in primary health care in low-and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家初级卫生保健中用于非传染性疾病管理的数字健康干预措施。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Feb 1;6(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00764-4.