Grimm F, Walcker M, Milosevic L, Naros G, Bender B, Weiss D, Gharabaghi A
Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Department for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Faculty of Medicine, University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Neuroimage Clin. 2025;45:103709. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.
To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.
Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.
The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen's (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.
Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.
丘脑深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗特发性震颤(ET)的效果各异,这可能是由于难以确定DBS植入的最佳靶点。最近的方法将临床反应与基于连接性的靶点区域分割进行比较。然而,研究结果相互矛盾,表明与初级运动皮层(M1)或与运动前区/辅助运动皮层(SMA)的连接在治疗上具有相关性。
确定与DBS治疗ET临床有效靶点相对应的连接图谱。
对20例接受双侧丘脑DBS治疗的ET患者进行了基于患者个体的概率扩散张量成像。在单极评估后,将每个半球最有效的触点的刺激反应分类为上肢震颤完全抑制与不完全抑制(共40次评估)。最后,估计这些触点在皮质和小脑震颤网络内的连接图谱,并在两组之间进行比较。
导致震颤完全抑制(n = 25)与不完全抑制(n = 15)的有效触点显示出与M1(p < 0.001)、体感皮层(p = 0.008)、小脑前叶(p = 0.026)和SMA(p = 0.05)的连接性显著更高;Cohen's(d)效应量分别为0.53、0.42、0.25和0.10。在不要求更高刺激强度或不引起额外副作用的情况下实现了临床益处。
DBS治疗ET的临床有效性对应于一种分布式连接图谱,其中与感觉运动皮层的连接最为相关。需要在更大的队列中进行长期随访并在样本外数据中进行重复验证,以确认这些发现的稳健性。