• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颠覆驱动创新:优化功能神经外科手术的效率

Disruption Driving Innovation: Optimising Efficiency in Functional Neurosurgery.

作者信息

Zrinzo Ludvic, Akram Harith, Hyam Jonathan, Candelario-Mckeown Joseph, Rangnekar Ranjit, Nwanze Ashley, Xu San San, Foltynie Thomas, Limousin Patricia, Krüger Marie T

机构信息

Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

General Management, Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

出版信息

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2025;103(2):81-89. doi: 10.1159/000542110. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1159/000542110
PMID:39608320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11965837/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rising NHS waiting lists are a major problem following the COVID-19 pandemic. In our institution, surgical waiting time for elective functional neurosurgical procedures, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), reached >1.5 years by the end of 2022. During 2023, reduced operating room availability, intraoperative MRI (iMRI) suite closure for refurbishment, and ongoing strikes threatened to increase waiting times further.

METHODS

Our previous surgical workflow for DBS and RFA procedures was examined. Several aspects were identified, and changes implemented to increase efficiency. Procedure numbers, waiting times, lead placement accuracy, and complication rates before and after these changes were compared.

RESULTS

Prior to 2023, an average of 0.8 new procedures were performed per surgical list. Introduction of a new workflow in 2023 allowed an average of 1.6 new procedures per surgical list (100% increase in productivity). In 2023, 95 DBS and 31 RFA procedures were performed on 79 surgical lists. This represents a 52% increase over "pre-pandemic" activity in 2019 (74 DBS, 9 RFA) on 102 available surgical lists. Mean (SD) targeting accuracy (0.8 [0.4] mm) was comparable to previous years (0.9[0.3] mm). In 2023, there were no infections requiring hardware removal and only one asymptomatic haemorrhage following an RFA procedure. The surgical waiting time was reduced from >1.5 years to <4 months by the end of 2023.

CONCLUSION

Changes in surgical workflow, with neurosurgeons working in parallel, maximise surgical efficiency and productivity, significantly increasing the number of DBS and RFA procedures without compromising accuracy and safety.

INTRODUCTION

Rising NHS waiting lists are a major problem following the COVID-19 pandemic. In our institution, surgical waiting time for elective functional neurosurgical procedures, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), reached >1.5 years by the end of 2022. During 2023, reduced operating room availability, intraoperative MRI (iMRI) suite closure for refurbishment, and ongoing strikes threatened to increase waiting times further.

METHODS

Our previous surgical workflow for DBS and RFA procedures was examined. Several aspects were identified, and changes implemented to increase efficiency. Procedure numbers, waiting times, lead placement accuracy, and complication rates before and after these changes were compared.

RESULTS

Prior to 2023, an average of 0.8 new procedures were performed per surgical list. Introduction of a new workflow in 2023 allowed an average of 1.6 new procedures per surgical list (100% increase in productivity). In 2023, 95 DBS and 31 RFA procedures were performed on 79 surgical lists. This represents a 52% increase over "pre-pandemic" activity in 2019 (74 DBS, 9 RFA) on 102 available surgical lists. Mean (SD) targeting accuracy (0.8 [0.4] mm) was comparable to previous years (0.9[0.3] mm). In 2023, there were no infections requiring hardware removal and only one asymptomatic haemorrhage following an RFA procedure. The surgical waiting time was reduced from >1.5 years to <4 months by the end of 2023.

CONCLUSION

Changes in surgical workflow, with neurosurgeons working in parallel, maximise surgical efficiency and productivity, significantly increasing the number of DBS and RFA procedures without compromising accuracy and safety.

摘要

引言

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)候诊名单不断增加是新冠疫情后的一个主要问题。在我们机构,截至2022年底,诸如脑深部电刺激术(DBS)和射频消融术(RFA)等择期功能性神经外科手术的手术等待时间已超过1.5年。在2023年,手术室可用时间减少、术中磁共振成像(iMRI)套房关闭进行翻新以及持续的罢工有可能使等待时间进一步增加。

方法

我们检查了之前DBS和RFA手术的工作流程。确定了几个方面,并进行了改进以提高效率。比较了这些改变前后的手术数量、等待时间、电极植入准确性和并发症发生率。

结果

在2023年之前,每个手术清单平均进行0.8例新手术。2023年引入新的工作流程后,每个手术清单平均可进行1.6例新手术(生产率提高100%)。2023年,在79个手术清单上进行了95例DBS手术和31例RFA手术。这比2019年“疫情前”102个可用手术清单上的手术量(74例DBS手术、9例RFA手术)增加了52%。平均(标准差)靶点定位准确性(0.8[0.4]毫米)与前几年(0.9[0.3]毫米)相当。2023年,没有感染需要取出硬件,RFA手术后只有一例无症状出血。到2023年底,手术等待时间从超过1.5年缩短至不到4个月。

结论

通过神经外科医生并行工作改变手术工作流程,可最大限度提高手术效率和生产率,在不影响准确性和安全性的情况下显著增加DBS和RFA手术的数量。

引言

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)候诊名单不断增加是新冠疫情后的一个主要问题。在我们机构,截至2022年底,诸如脑深部电刺激术(DBS)和射频消融术(RFA)等择期功能性神经外科手术的手术等待时间已超过1.5年。在2023年,手术室可用时间减少、术中磁共振成像(iMRI)套房关闭进行翻新以及持续的罢工有可能使等待时间进一步增加。

方法

我们检查了之前DBS和RFA手术的工作流程。确定了几个方面,并进行了改进以提高效率。比较了这些改变前后的手术数量、等待时间、电极植入准确性和并发症发生率。

结果

在2023年之前,每个手术清单平均进行0.8例新手术。2023年引入新的工作流程后,每个手术清单平均可进行1.6例新手术(生产率提高100%)。2023年,在79个手术清单上进行了95例DBS手术和31例RFA手术。这比2019年“疫情前”102个可用手术清单上的手术量(74例DBS手术、9例RFA手术)增加了52%。平均(标准差)靶点定位准确性(0.8[0.4]毫米)与前几年(0.9[0.3]毫米)相当。2023年,没有感染需要取出硬件,RFA手术后只有一例无症状出血。到2023年底,手术等待时间从超过1.5年缩短至不到4个月。

结论

通过神经外科医生并行工作改变手术工作流程,可最大限度提高手术效率和生产率,在不影响准确性和安全性的情况下显著增加DBS和RFA手术的数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6047/11965837/219ea534a7d1/sfn-2025-0103-0002-542110_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6047/11965837/0f929dc68127/sfn-2025-0103-0002-542110_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6047/11965837/219ea534a7d1/sfn-2025-0103-0002-542110_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6047/11965837/0f929dc68127/sfn-2025-0103-0002-542110_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6047/11965837/219ea534a7d1/sfn-2025-0103-0002-542110_F02.jpg

相似文献

1
Disruption Driving Innovation: Optimising Efficiency in Functional Neurosurgery.颠覆驱动创新:优化功能神经外科手术的效率
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2025;103(2):81-89. doi: 10.1159/000542110. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.静脉曲张的血管内射频消融术:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011;11(1):1-93. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
3
Intraoperative MRI for optimizing electrode placement for deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson disease.术中磁共振成像用于优化帕金森病丘脑底核深部脑刺激电极置入
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):62-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141534. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
4
Clinical outcomes of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: a comparison of intraoperative MRI- and MER-guided lead placement.帕金森病苍白球深部脑刺激的临床结果:术中MRI引导与MER引导电极植入的比较
J Neurosurg. 2020 Mar 6;134(3):1072-1082. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.JNS192010. Print 2021 Mar 1.
5
Deep brain stimulator implantation in a diagnostic MRI suite: infection history over a 10-year period.在诊断性磁共振成像套件中植入深部脑刺激器:10 年间的感染史。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):108-113. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS15750. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
6
Radiofrequency Ablation Through Previously Effective Deep Brain Stimulation Leads for Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Series.经先前有效的深部脑刺激导联进行射频消融治疗帕金森病:一项回顾性系列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e750-e765. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.060. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Accuracy, precision, and safety of stereotactic, frame-based, intraoperative MRI-guided and MRI-verified deep brain stimulation in 650 consecutive procedures.650例连续手术中基于框架的立体定向术中MRI引导及MRI验证的深部脑刺激的准确性、精确性和安全性
J Neurosurg. 2022 Oct 28;138(6):1702-1711. doi: 10.3171/2022.8.JNS22968. Print 2023 Jun 1.
8
MR-Guided Functional Neurosurgery: Laser Ablation and Deep Brain Stimulation.磁共振引导下的功能神经外科手术:激光消融与脑深部电刺激
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jun;27(3):171-177. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000152.
9
Nowcasting waiting lists for elective procedures and surgery in England: a modelling study.英国择期手术和外科手术等待名单的即时预测:一项建模研究。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02073-1.
10
Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation.手术修正深部脑刺激导联轨迹对 3T MRI 时射频加热的影响:从体模实验到临床实施。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 10;140(5):1459-1470. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.JNS23580. Print 2024 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes after MRI connectivity-guided radiofrequency thalamotomy for tremor.MRI 连接导向射频丘脑切开术治疗震颤的临床结果。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Oct 13;140(4):1148-1154. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.JNS222744. Print 2024 Apr 1.
2
Doctors' strikes: the NHS faces its toughest test yet.医生罢工:英国国民医疗服务体系面临迄今为止最严峻的考验。
BMJ. 2023 Sep 19;382:2143. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2143.
3
Accuracy, precision, and safety of stereotactic, frame-based, intraoperative MRI-guided and MRI-verified deep brain stimulation in 650 consecutive procedures.
650例连续手术中基于框架的立体定向术中MRI引导及MRI验证的深部脑刺激的准确性、精确性和安全性
J Neurosurg. 2022 Oct 28;138(6):1702-1711. doi: 10.3171/2022.8.JNS22968. Print 2023 Jun 1.
4
Double trouble with double-booking: limitations and dangers of overlapping surgery.双重预约的双重麻烦:重叠手术的局限性与风险
Br J Surg. 2022 Aug 16;109(9):787-789. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac244.
5
Surgical and Hardware Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation-A Single Surgeon Experience of 519 Cases Over 20 Years.深部脑刺激术的手术和硬件并发症——20 年来一位外科医生 519 例的经验。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Aug;25(6):895-903. doi: 10.1111/ner.13360. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Comparison of a dual-surgeon versus single-surgeon approach for scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双主刀与单主刀在脊柱侧弯手术中应用的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Mar;30(3):740-748. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06717-3. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Letter to the Editor. ClearPoint versus frame-based MRI-guided and MRI-verified deep brain stimulation.致编辑的信。ClearPoint与基于框架的磁共振成像引导及磁共振成像验证的深部脑刺激
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 17;133(5):1624-1626. doi: 10.3171/2019.10.JNS192845. Print 2020 Nov 1.
8
Deep Brain Stimulation for Pain in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review.现代深部脑刺激治疗疼痛:系统评价。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):191-202. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy552.
9
Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review.手术时间延长增加手术部位感染风险:一项系统评价
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Aug/Sep;18(6):722-735. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.089.
10
Efficacy of pallidal stimulation in isolated dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.苍白球刺激术治疗孤立性肌张力障碍的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Apr;24(4):552-560. doi: 10.1111/ene.13255. Epub 2017 Feb 10.