• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康经济质量评估清单在系统评价中的应用

An Application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations in a Systematic Review Setting.

作者信息

Dijk Stijntje W, Essafi Skander, Hunink Myriam G M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2025 Feb;28(2):250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3853. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3853
PMID:39608676
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Quality assessment tools serve an important role in evaluating economic evaluations. This article showcases the first application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations (CHEQUE) tool in a systematic review setting and offers descriptive reflections on its use.

METHODS

We applied CHEQUE to 21 diverse economic evaluations in a systematic review of medical education. We visualized weighted CHEQUE scores, calculate correlations between methods and reporting sections, and provided all data and R code for reuse in future applications. Finally, we provided a detailed overview of our judgments and alternative considerations of the checklist items, and suggestions for further development.

RESULTS

Scores ranged from 18% to 94% depending on the applied weighting method, with a positive correlation between the method and reporting quality. CHEQUE enables systematic and standardized assessment but may benefit from refinement in scoring clarity and burden reduction.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insights for future guidance on applying and developing CHEQUE or similar tools in economic evaluation quality assessment.

摘要

目的

质量评估工具在评估经济评价中发挥着重要作用。本文展示了健康经济质量评估清单(CHEQUE)工具在系统评价中的首次应用,并对其使用情况进行了描述性反思。

方法

在一项医学教育系统评价中,我们将CHEQUE应用于21项不同的经济评价。我们对加权后的CHEQUE分数进行了可视化处理,计算了方法与报告部分之间的相关性,并提供了所有数据和R代码以供未来应用重复使用。最后,我们详细概述了我们对清单项目的判断和其他考虑因素,以及进一步开发的建议。

结果

根据所应用的加权方法,分数范围为18%至94%,方法与报告质量之间呈正相关。CHEQUE能够进行系统和标准化的评估,但在评分清晰度和减轻负担方面可能需要改进。

结论

我们的研究为未来在经济评价质量评估中应用和开发CHEQUE或类似工具提供了指导见解。

相似文献

1
An Application of the Checklist for Health Economic Quality Evaluations in a Systematic Review Setting.健康经济质量评估清单在系统评价中的应用
Value Health. 2025 Feb;28(2):250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3853. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
5
What is the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative interventions for tendinopathy? An overview of systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness and systematic review of economic evaluations.针对肌腱病的保守干预措施的临床疗效和成本效益如何?临床疗效系统评价及经济评估系统评价综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(8):1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta19080.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在结直肠癌术前分期中的价值:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(35):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15350.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview on Methods, Evidence, and Study Quality of Health Economic Evaluation Studies for Independently Usable Digital Health Apps: Rapid Review.独立可用数字健康应用程序健康经济评估研究的方法、证据与研究质量概述:快速综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 19;27:e68349. doi: 10.2196/68349.
2
Economic evaluations in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.本科医学教育中的经济评估:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e091911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091911.
3
Directed Acyclic Graphs in Decision-Analytic Modeling: Bridging Causal Inference and Effective Model Design in Medical Decision Making.
决策分析建模中的有向无环图:在医疗决策中架起因果推理与有效模型设计的桥梁
Med Decis Making. 2025 Apr;45(3):223-231. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241310898. Epub 2025 Jan 23.