Spoelstra G B, Braams L M, IJpma F F A, van Oosten M, Feringa B L, Szymanski W, Elsinga P H, van Dijl Jan Maarten
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713GZ, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713GZ, The Netherlands.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Apr;52(5):1878-1889. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06997-z. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Bacterial infections pose major challenges in medicine. To guide effective infection treatment, faster and more accurate diagnostic modalities are needed. Bacteria-targeted molecular imaging can meet these needs. The present study was aimed at the in vivo evaluation of two F-vancomycin-based PET tracers, for detection of deep-seated Gram-positive bacterial infections. These tracers were bench-marked against the current standard of care, [F]FDG.
The potential of [F]BODIPY-FL-vancomycin and [F]PQ-VE1-vancomycin ([4+2]photocycloadduct of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone-vancomycin and [F]fluorinated vinyl ether) to distinguish bacterial infections from sterile inflammation was evaluated in a murine myositis model. Tracer specificity was assessed by infecting mice either with the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (n = 12) or the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli (n = 12). The contralateral leg was injected with Cytodex beads to induce sterile inflammation, or with phosphate-buffered saline for control. In parallel, mice were imaged with [F]FDG (n = 12). Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) measurements, biodistribution analyses, and immunohistopathology were performed to determine tracer distribution and bacterial burden.
Both F-vancomycin-PET tracers accumulated at sites of infection, but not at sites of sterile inflammation, in contrast to [F]FDG. The tracers exhibited distinct biodistribution profiles, with [F]BODIPY-FL-vancomycin being cleared more rapidly. Both F-vancomycin-PET tracers displayed significant target to non-target ratios of 2.95 for [F]BODIPY-FL-vancomycin and 1.48 for [F]PQ-VE1-vancomycin.
Vancomycin-based PET is a potentially attractive approach to distinguish Gram-positive bacterial infections from sterile inflammation.
细菌感染给医学带来了重大挑战。为了指导有效的感染治疗,需要更快、更准确的诊断方法。靶向细菌的分子成像可以满足这些需求。本研究旨在对两种基于F-万古霉素的PET示踪剂进行体内评估,以检测深部革兰氏阳性菌感染。这些示踪剂以当前的护理标准[F]FDG作为基准。
在小鼠肌炎模型中评估了[F]BODIPY-FL-万古霉素和[F]PQ-VE1-万古霉素(9,10-菲醌-万古霉素与[F]氟化乙烯醚的[4+2]光环加成物)区分细菌感染与无菌性炎症的潜力。通过用革兰氏阳性菌金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 12)或革兰氏阴性菌大肠杆菌(n = 12)感染小鼠来评估示踪剂的特异性。对侧腿注射Cytodex微珠以诱导无菌性炎症,或注射磷酸盐缓冲盐水作为对照。同时,用[F]FDG对小鼠进行成像(n = 12)。进行动态正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量、生物分布分析和免疫组织病理学检查以确定示踪剂分布和细菌负荷。
与[F]FDG相反,两种F-万古霉素-PET示踪剂均在感染部位积聚,但不在无菌性炎症部位积聚。示踪剂表现出不同的生物分布特征,[F]BODIPY-FL-万古霉素清除得更快。两种F-万古霉素-PET示踪剂的靶标与非靶标比率均显著,[F]BODIPY-FL-万古霉素为2.95,[F]PQ-VE1-万古霉素为1.48。
基于万古霉素的PET是区分革兰氏阳性菌感染与无菌性炎症的一种潜在有吸引力的方法。