Katsushima Masayuki, Nakamura Hideki, Shiko Yuki, Hanaoka Hideki, Shimizu Eiji
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Care and Medical Sports, Teikyo Heisei University, Ichihara, Japan.
Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 14;9:e59540. doi: 10.2196/59540.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is not sufficiently widespread in clinical practice, although evidence has been presented.
The purpose of this study was to explore whether one-on-one videoconference-based CBTp (vCBTp) is more effective than usual care (UC) alone for improving psychiatric symptoms in patients with schizophrenia attending outpatient clinics.
In this exploratory randomized controlled trial, patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders who were still taking medication in an outpatient clinic were randomly assigned to either the vCBTp plus UC group (n=12) or the UC group (n=12). The vCBTp program was conducted once a week, with each session lasting for 50 minutes, for a total of 7 sessions conducted in real-time and in a one-on-one format remotely using a loaned tablet computer (iPad). The primary outcome was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, which measures the difference in the mean change from baseline (week 0) to posttest (week 8).
The study included 24 participants. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at baseline. With regard to significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of the primary outcome, the mean change in the PANSS total score from baseline to week 8 in the vCBTp plus UC group was -9.5 (95% CI -12.09 to -6.91) and the mean change in the UC alone group was 6.9 (95% CI 1.54-12.30). The difference between the 2 groups was significant (P<.001). In addition, significant improvements were observed in the subscales of positive (P<.001) and negative (P=.004) symptoms and general psychopathology (P<.001). Significant differences were also observed in the secondary outcomes of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; P=.04) and EQ-5D-5L (P=.005). There were no dropouts and no serious adverse events in this study.
A total of 7 remote vCBTp sessions conducted in the vCBTp plus UC group could be safely administered to patients with schizophrenia. They were also observed to be effective for psychiatric symptoms, general anxiety, and quality of life. However, because of the observed worsening of scores in the UC group, caution is required in interpreting significant differences between the 2 groups. This approach is expected to improve accessibility to CBTp for outpatients with schizophrenia and social anxiety regarding transportation use and financial and physical burdens related to transportation, and to contribute to promoting CBTp acceptability by compensating for the shortage of implementers.
University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000043396; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049544.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069734.
尽管已有证据表明,但针对精神病的认知行为疗法(CBTp)在临床实践中的普及程度仍不够高。
本研究旨在探讨基于一对一视频会议的CBTp(vCBTp)对于改善门诊精神分裂症患者的精神症状是否比单纯常规治疗(UC)更有效。
在这项探索性随机对照试验中,将仍在门诊接受药物治疗的精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍患者随机分为vCBTp联合UC组(n = 12)或UC组(n = 12)。vCBTp项目每周进行一次,每次 session 持续50分钟,共进行7次实时一对一远程 session,使用租借的平板电脑(iPad)。主要结局指标为阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分,该量表用于测量从基线(第0周)到测试后(第8周)的平均变化差异。
本研究纳入了24名参与者。两组在基线时无显著差异。关于两组在主要结局指标方面的显著差异,vCBTp联合UC组从基线到第8周的PANSS总分平均变化为-9.5(95%CI -12.09至-6.91),单纯UC组的平均变化为6.9(95%CI 1.54 - 12.30)。两组间差异显著(P <.001)。此外,在阳性(P <.001)、阴性(P =.004)症状以及一般精神病理学(P <.001)的子量表方面观察到显著改善。在广泛性焦虑障碍-7(GAD-7;P =.04)和EQ-5D-5L(P =.005)的次要结局指标上也观察到显著差异。本研究中无脱落病例且无严重不良事件。
vCBTp联合UC组进行的总共7次远程vCBTp session可以安全地应用于精神分裂症患者。还观察到它们对精神症状、广泛性焦虑和生活质量有效。然而,由于观察到UC组分数恶化,在解释两组间的显著差异时需要谨慎。这种方法有望提高精神分裂症门诊患者获得CBTp的可及性,减少与交通使用相关的社交焦虑以及交通带来的经济和身体负担,并通过弥补实施者短缺来促进CBTp的可接受性。
大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心UMIN000043396;https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049544。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069734。