• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 ICD-11 分类系统建立儿童期创伤史与人格障碍之间的关系。

Establishing the relationship between history of childhood trauma and personality disorder using the ICD-11 classification system.

机构信息

University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

Faculty of Health, Art and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e1648. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1648.

DOI:10.1002/pmh.1648
PMID:39610219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11605266/
Abstract

The temporal relationship between childhood trauma and personality status using the ICD-11 classification was examined in 75 adults (65%F) aged between 19 and 72 selected by constrained procedure to ensure the full range of personality disturbance. Trauma history was assessed using the Childhood Traumatic Events Scale, past and recent versions and personality status using scales to assess the severity and domains of the ICD-11 system, PDS-ICD-11 and PAQ-11. The PDS-ICD-11 findings showed 52 (59.3%) had some personality disturbance with 17 (22.7%) having moderate or severe personality disorder. There was a significant association between childhood sexual trauma and ICD-11 personality severity (p = 0.005) and a lessened association with recent trauma (p = 0.02). Apart from the borderline composite score, the PAQ-11 negative affectivity domain was significantly associated with childhood sexual trauma (p = 0.003), but other domains were not linked. The Anankastia domain was significantly associated with early major physical illness (p = 0.012), and physical illness both in early life (p = 0.005) and recent exposure (p = 0.024) were associated with personality disorder. Other forms of childhood abuse and illness or injury in childhood did not differ with regard to later personality disorder. The results confirm a significant but not overwhelming relationship between childhood sexual trauma and severity of ICD-11 personality disturbance in adult life that is greater than for other classes of trauma.

摘要

使用 ICD-11 分类法,研究了 75 名年龄在 19 至 72 岁之间的成年人(65%为女性)的童年创伤与人格状况之间的时间关系,这些成年人是通过受限程序选择的,以确保人格障碍的全面范围。使用儿童创伤事件量表(Childhood Traumatic Events Scale)评估创伤史,过去和最近的版本,并使用评估 ICD-11 系统严重程度和领域的量表评估人格状况,包括 PDS-ICD-11 和 PAQ-11。PDS-ICD-11 的研究结果显示,有 52 人(59.3%)存在某种人格障碍,其中 17 人(22.7%)存在中度或严重人格障碍。童年性创伤与 ICD-11 人格严重程度之间存在显著关联(p=0.005),与近期创伤的关联较小(p=0.02)。除了边缘型综合评分外,PAQ-11 的负性情感领域与童年性创伤显著相关(p=0.003),但其他领域则没有关联。强迫性人格特质与早期主要身体疾病显著相关(p=0.012),早期和近期的身体疾病暴露与人格障碍相关(p=0.005 和 p=0.024)。童年期其他形式的虐待、疾病或伤害与后期人格障碍无关。研究结果证实,童年期性创伤与成人生活中 ICD-11 人格障碍严重程度之间存在显著但非压倒性的关系,这种关系比其他类型的创伤更为明显。

相似文献

1
Establishing the relationship between history of childhood trauma and personality disorder using the ICD-11 classification system.使用 ICD-11 分类系统建立儿童期创伤史与人格障碍之间的关系。
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e1648. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1648.
2
Reliability and validity of the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale and the Revised Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11R) in a Norwegian community sample.在挪威社区样本中,人格障碍严重程度 ICD-11(PDS-ICD-11)量表和修订版人格评估问卷 ICD-11(PAQ-11R)的信度和效度。
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):347-356. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1630. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders.人格障碍 ICD-11 分类的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3.
4
The impact of types of childhood maltreatment on the severity of PTSD and comorbid personality disorder symptoms.童年期虐待类型对创伤后应激障碍严重程度及共病性人格障碍症状的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2491172. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2491172. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
5
Abuse and neglect in childhood: relationship to personality disorder diagnoses.童年期的虐待与忽视:与人格障碍诊断的关系。
CNS Spectr. 2003 Oct;8(10):737-54. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900019118.
6
Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Dimensional Models of Personality Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges.童年创伤经历与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版及《国际疾病分类》第11版中的人格障碍维度模型:机遇与挑战
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Jul 19;23(9):60. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01265-5.
7
Traumatic exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in borderline, schizotypal, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study.边缘型、分裂型、回避型和强迫型人格障碍中的创伤暴露与创伤后应激障碍:来自协作性纵向人格障碍研究的发现
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002 Aug;190(8):510-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200208000-00003.
8
Verification of five-factor models and reference scores for personality dysfunction and trait domains of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11), revised version.验证人格障碍和特质领域的人格评估问卷-11(PAQ-11)修订版的五因素模型和参考分数。
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):424-434. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1637. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
9
Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) among treatment-seeking people with adverse childhood experiences in South Korea.韩国有童年不良经历的求治者中国际创伤访谈(ITI)的效度验证
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2447182. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2447182. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
10
Borderline personality features in relationship to childhood trauma in unipolar depressive and bipolar disorders.单相抑郁和双相情感障碍中边缘型人格特征与童年创伤的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 15;363:358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.101. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of Betrayal Trauma on Schizoid Personality Pathology.背叛创伤对分裂样人格病理的影响。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2024 Jul-Sep;25(4):456-466. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2024.2323972. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
2
ICD-11 personality disorder features in the danish general population: Cut-offs and prevalence rates for severity levels.《丹麦普通人群中的 ICD-11 人格障碍特征:严重程度的截断值和患病率》
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115484. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115484. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
3
Comparison of childhood trauma between depressive disorders and personality disorders.比较抑郁症和人格障碍患者的童年创伤。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Nov;17(4):396-407. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1589. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
The effect of environmental change, planned and unplanned life events on the long-term outcome of common mental disorders.环境变化、计划和非计划生活事件对常见精神障碍长期结局的影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;59(9):1587-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02520-1. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Borderline personality disorder: a spurious condition unsupported by science that should be abandoned.边缘型人格障碍:一种无科学依据的虚假病症,应予以摒弃。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Apr;116(4):148-150. doi: 10.1177/01410768231164780. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
Examining the construct validity of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11) personality trait domains in a community sample.在社区样本中检验《国际疾病分类第 11 版人格障碍检查表》(PAQ-11)人格特质领域的结构效度。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Aug;17(3):197-207. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1573. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
7
Nature and Assessment of Personality Pathology and Diagnosis.人格病理学的本质、评估与诊断
Am J Psychother. 2023 Mar 1;76(1):3-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20220016. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Normative data for the LPFS-BF 2.0 derived from the Danish general population and relationship with psychosocial impairment.源自丹麦普通人群的LPFS-BF 2.0规范数据及其与心理社会损害的关系。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 May;17(2):157-164. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1570. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
9
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder.复杂性创伤后应激障碍。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):60-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00821-2.
10
Maladaptive personality traits may link childhood trauma history to current internalizing symptoms.适应不良的人格特质可能会将童年创伤史与当前的内化症状联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct;63(5):468-475. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12830. Epub 2022 May 23.