Suppr超能文献

水凝胶间隔物直肠壁浸润深度与直肠毒性无关:一项随机前瞻性试验的结果

Depth of Hydrogel Spacer Rectal Wall Infiltration Was Not Associated With Rectal Toxicity: Results From a Randomized Prospective Trial.

作者信息

Grossman Craig E, Akin Oguz, Damato Antonio L, Nunez David A, Zelefsky Michael J

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 11;9(12):101624. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101624. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Rectal spacers have gained popularity as a dose-sparing material for prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT). However, the procedure can be associated with unintended rectal wall infiltration (RWI) of the spacer gel. We therefore classified RWI severity as a function of depth and explored its association with rectal toxicity using a data set from prostate cancer patients treated with RT on a prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Postimplant T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of 149 subjects randomized to the hydrogel spacer arm of a published multicenter RCT were assessed for the presence and depth of RWI. All implants were assigned a score of 0 (no rectal wall signal changes), 1 (rectal wall edema/signal change), 2 (partial RWI), or 3 (full-thickness RWI); RWI was defined as a score of 2 or 3. Correlations were made between RWI score and physician-reported procedure, acute, and late rectal toxicity.

RESULTS

Although 62.4% of implants had no rectal wall signal abnormalities, 24% [scores of 2 (20.1%) and 3 (4.0%)] of procedures exhibited radiographic evidence of RWI. Full-thickness RWI was associated with both a longer length (22.8 ± 7.0 mm, = .008) and a larger circumferential percentage (35.8% ± 9.2%, = .045) of rectal infiltration. Although 7 subjects (5%) experienced transient procedure-related rectal toxicities (most commonly perineal/rectal pain), only one had RWI (score of 2, National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1). Consequently, no correlation was observed between procedural rectal toxicity and the presence/extent of RWI ( = .64). Similarly, no difference in acute ( = .64) or late ( = .85) rectal toxicity incidence or grade was detected between RWI categories; none of the 6 men with a RWI score of 3 developed late rectal toxicity by 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from an RCT, RWI did not contribute to increased rectal toxicity prior and up to 15 months after conventional prostate cancer RT.

摘要

目的

直肠间隔物作为前列腺癌放射治疗(RT)的一种剂量节省材料已越来越受欢迎。然而,该操作可能与间隔物凝胶意外浸润直肠壁(RWI)有关。因此,我们根据深度对RWI严重程度进行分类,并利用一项前瞻性随机临床试验(RCT)中接受RT治疗的前列腺癌患者的数据集,探讨其与直肠毒性的关联。

方法和材料

对149名随机分配到已发表的多中心RCT水凝胶间隔物组的受试者植入后T2加权磁共振图像进行评估,以确定RWI的存在和深度。所有植入物均被赋予0分(直肠壁信号无变化)、1分(直肠壁水肿/信号变化)、2分(部分RWI)或3分(全层RWI);RWI定义为2分或3分。对RWI评分与医生报告的操作、急性和晚期直肠毒性进行相关性分析。

结果

虽然62.4%的植入物直肠壁信号无异常,但24%的操作[2分(20.1%)和3分(4.0%)]显示有RWI的影像学证据。全层RWI与更长的浸润长度(22.8±7.0mm,P = 0.008)和更大的直肠浸润圆周百分比(35.8%±9.2%,P = 0.045)相关。虽然7名受试者(5%)经历了与操作相关的短暂直肠毒性(最常见的是会阴/直肠疼痛),但只有1人有RWI(2分,美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准1级)。因此,未观察到操作引起的直肠毒性与RWI的存在/程度之间存在相关性(P = 0.64)。同样,在RWI类别之间未检测到急性(P = 0.64)或晚期(P = 0.85)直肠毒性发生率或分级的差异;6名RWI评分为3分的男性在15个月时均未发生晚期直肠毒性。

结论

根据一项RCT的数据,在传统前列腺癌RT之前及之后长达15个月,RWI并未导致直肠毒性增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9c0/11602978/4b9f1916f4c7/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验