AlKetbi Latifa Baynouna, Nagelkerke Nico, AlAlawi Noura, Humaid Ahmed, AlKetbi Rudina, Aleissaee Hamda, AlShamsi Noura, Abdulbaqi Hanan, Fahmawee Toqa, AlHashaikeh Basil, AlDobaee Muna, AlShamsi Mariam, AlAhbabi Nayla, AlAzeezi AlYazia, Shuaib Fatima, Alnuaimi Jawaher, Mahmoud Esraa, AlDhaheri Alreem, AlMansoori Mohammed, AlKalbani Sanaa, AYahyaee Aysha, AlDerie Wesayef, Saeed Ekram, AlMarzooqi Nouf, AlHassani Ahmed, AlAhmadi Amira, Sahyouni Mohammad, AlFahmawi Farah, AlAlawi Ali, Sahalu Yusra, AlAnsari Zinab, Doucoure Khadija, Ashoor Rawan, AlShamsi Reem, AlAzeezi Maha, AlMeqbaali Fatima, Yahya Noor, AlAlawi Shamma, AlKetbi Fatima
Ambulatory Healthcare Services Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates.
United Arab Emirates University Al Ain United Arab Emirates.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):e035930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035930. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Cardiovascular disease risk assessment is a key tool in primary prevention. The ADRS (Abu Dhabi Risk Study) is a retrospective cohort study aiming to develop 10-year risk prediction equations for coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and validate international risk equations.
The 8699 participants were examined in the Abu Dhabi cardiovascular screening program from 2011 to 2013 with a subsequent average follow-up of 9.2 years. They were assessed in 2023 for new CAD, admissions for acute coronary syndrome, or stroke. The validation cohort, 2554 subjects, is from the 2016 to 2017 Abu Dhabi community screening program, with 6.67 years average follow-up. Of 8504 ASCVD-free subjects, 250 experienced new CAD events. ASCVD risk factors in this population were age, sex, smoking, high cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and diabetes diagnosis, in addition to low vitamin D level and low glomerular filtration rate. Three ADRS prediction models were derived using Cox regression. The ADRS-CAD had a C statistic of 0.899 (0.882-0.916) compared with 0.828 (0.803-0.852) for the Framingham Risk Score in the same sample. ADRS-stroke had a C statistic of 0.904 (0.865-0.944). The ADRS-ASCVD had a C statistic of 0.898 (0.883-0.913) compared with 0.891 (0.875-0.907) of pooled cohort equations and 0.825 (0.802-0.847) for Framingham Risk Score-cardiovascular disease. Applying our formulas to the validation cohort yielded C statistics of 0.825 (0.803-0.846), 0.799 (0.774-0.824), and 0.761 (0.71-0.813) for ASCVD, CAD, and stroke, respectively. The pooled cohort equations in this cohort had a C statistic for ASCVD of 0.824 (0.802-0.846).
This study demonstrates the value of tailoring risk assessments to local populations and health care contexts.
心血管疾病风险评估是一级预防的关键工具。阿布扎比风险研究(ADRS)是一项回顾性队列研究,旨在开发冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、中风和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的10年风险预测方程,并验证国际风险方程。
2011年至2013年期间,8699名参与者参加了阿布扎比心血管筛查项目,随后平均随访9.2年。2023年对他们进行了新发性CAD、急性冠状动脉综合征入院或中风的评估。验证队列包括2554名受试者,来自2016年至2017年的阿布扎比社区筛查项目,平均随访6.67年。在8504名无ASCVD的受试者中,250人发生了新发性CAD事件。除了维生素D水平低和肾小球滤过率低外,该人群的ASCVD风险因素包括年龄、性别、吸烟、高胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白比值和糖尿病诊断。使用Cox回归得出了三个ADRS预测模型。在同一样本中,ADRS-CAD的C统计量为0.899(0.882-0.916),而弗雷明汉风险评分的C统计量为0.828(0.803-0.852)。ADRS-中风的C统计量为0.904(0.865-0.944)。ADRS-ASCVD的C统计量为0.898(0.883-0.913),而汇总队列方程的C统计量为0.891(0.875-0.907),弗雷明汉风险评分-心血管疾病的C统计量为0.825(0.802-0.847)。将我们的公式应用于验证队列,ASCVD、CAD和中风的C统计量分别为0.825(0.803-0.846)、0.799(0.774-0.824)和0.761(0.71-0.813)。该队列中汇总队列方程的ASCVD的C统计量为0.824(0.802-0.846)。
本研究证明了根据当地人群和医疗保健背景量身定制风险评估的价值。