• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腰椎外侧椎间融合术:单机构连续病例系列

Outpatient lateral lumbar interbody fusion: single-institution consecutive case series.

作者信息

Alan Nima, Lee Katriel E, Leal Isaza Juan Pablo, Giraldo Juan P, Dugan Robert K, Zhou James J, Farber S Harrison, O'Neill Luke K, Uribe Juan S

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Nov 29;42(2):140-146. doi: 10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231041. Print 2025 Feb 1.

DOI:10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231041
PMID:39612502
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Outpatient spine surgery could reduce hospital costs and improve patient outcomes. Outpatient lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) can be performed for select patients. This study identified and compared the demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of patients who underwent outpatient versus inpatient single-level LLIF.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent first-time single-level LLIF at a single institution performed by the same surgeon from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2022. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, and medical comorbidities, were collected. Surgical factors, such as level of surgery, operative duration, and estimated blood loss, were also collected. Length of stay and 30-day readmission were the primary outcomes of interest. Patients discharged on the day of surgery or the following day were considered to be in the outpatient group. ANOVA and chi-square tests were performed to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate logistic regression was used to examine the correlation between baseline demographic and surgical variables and outpatient surgery. If a variable significantly correlated with outpatient surgery on univariate analysis, it was subsequently used in multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients underwent first-time single-level LLIF, and 48 (44.9%) did not have posterior instrumentation. Fifty-three (49.5%) patients were women. The median age and BMI were 66.3 years and 28.9, respectively. The mean length of stay was 1 day (range 0-4 days), with 71 (66.4%) of 107 single-level LLIFs managed on an outpatient basis. There were no readmissions within 30 days. Patients in the outpatient group were more likely than patients in the inpatient group to be male (59% [42/71] vs 25% [9/36], p = 0.002), have a low LACE (risk criteria based on length of stay, acuity of the admission, comorbidity of the patient, and emergency department use within 6 months before admission) readmission index (63% [45/71] vs 28% [10/36], p < 0.001), and have a stand-alone construct (62% [44/71] vs 11% [4/36], p < 0.001). The outpatient cohort also had a shorter mean operative duration (104.4 vs 175.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and lower mean estimated blood loss (20 vs 100 mL, p < 0.001). There was no difference in age between the groups. Factors that remained significant on multivariate logistic regression were male sex (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.53; p = 0.004), lower LACE readmission index (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.25; p < 0.001), and stand-alone construct (OR 8.17, 95% CI 1.49-44.74; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple baseline and surgical characteristics were more common in the outpatient setting. With appropriate patient selection, single-level LLIF can be achieved on an outpatient basis.

摘要

目的

门诊脊柱手术可降低医院成本并改善患者预后。对于部分患者可进行门诊腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)。本研究确定并比较了接受门诊与住院单节段LLIF患者的人口统计学、临床和手术特征。

方法

对一个前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库包含2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日在同一机构由同一位外科医生进行首次单节段LLIF手术的患者。收集人口统计学特征,包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和合并症。还收集手术因素,如手术节段、手术时长和估计失血量。住院时间和30天再入院率是主要关注的结果。手术当天或次日出院的患者被纳入门诊组。分别进行方差分析(ANOVA)和卡方检验以比较连续变量和分类变量。采用单因素逻辑回归分析来检验基线人口统计学和手术变量与门诊手术之间的相关性。如果一个变量在单因素分析中与门诊手术显著相关,则随后将其用于多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

共有107例患者接受了首次单节段LLIF手术,其中48例(44.9%)未进行后路内固定。53例(49.5%)患者为女性。年龄中位数和BMI分别为66.3岁和28.9。平均住院时间为1天(范围0 - 4天),107例单节段LLIF手术中有71例(66.4%)为门诊手术。30天内无再入院情况。门诊组患者比住院组患者更可能为男性(59% [42/71] 对 25% [9/36],p = 0.002),LACE(基于住院时间、入院急症程度、患者合并症以及入院前6个月内急诊科就诊情况的风险标准)再入院指数较低(63% [45/71] 对 28% [10/36],p < 0.001),且采用独立结构(62% [44/71] 对 11% [4/36],p < 0.001)。门诊队列的平均手术时长也较短(104.4对175.5分钟,p < 0.001),平均估计失血量较低(20对100 mL,p < 0.001)。两组患者年龄无差异。多因素逻辑回归分析中仍具有显著意义的因素为男性(比值比[OR] 0.14,95%置信区间[CI] 0.04 - 0.53;p = 0.004)、较低的LACE再入院指数(OR 0.06,95% CI 0.02 - 0.25;p < 0.001)以及独立结构(OR 8.17,95% CI 1.49 - 44.74;p = 0.02)。

结论

多种基线和手术特征在门诊手术情况下更为常见。通过适当的患者选择,单节段LLIF手术可在门诊完成。

相似文献

1
Outpatient lateral lumbar interbody fusion: single-institution consecutive case series.门诊腰椎外侧椎间融合术:单机构连续病例系列
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Nov 29;42(2):140-146. doi: 10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231041. Print 2025 Feb 1.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Pathology: Clinical Outcome Comparison in Patients With Predominant Back Pain.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与侧方腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性脊柱病变:以腰痛为主诉患者的临床疗效比较。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E441-E447. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001631. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.老年人腰椎外侧椎间融合术:10年经验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 1;29(5):525-529. doi: 10.3171/2018.3.SPINE171147. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
4
Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.微创前路和外侧经椎间孔入路闭合复位治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱:初步临床和放射学经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574.
5
Obesity and Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Single-Level Transforaminal versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创单节段经椎间孔与腰椎外侧椎间融合术后的肥胖与临床、影像学及手术结果
World Neurosurg. 2025 Mar;195:123691. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123691. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
6
Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.基于方法的 30 天再入院、再手术和发病率的比较分析,以及使用 ACS-NSQIP 数据集行腰椎体间融合术的患者。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):432-441. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002850.
7
Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients.门诊选择性后路腰椎融合术似乎可安全地用于适当选择的患者。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1188-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.严重脊柱骨盆失配的矫正:与经椎弓根截骨术相比,外侧腰椎前凸椎间融合器植入术可减少失血。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17195.
9
Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.椎间融合器辅助下单纯腰椎外侧椎间融合术后植骨沉降作为翻修手术预测因素的研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):50-56. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE16427. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Patient Selection and Outcome Measures Compared With an Inhospital Cohort.门诊手术中心的腰椎侧方椎间融合术:与住院队列相比的患者选择和结果指标
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(8):686-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001285.