Kasradze Sofia, Lomidze Giorgi, Gogatishvili Nino, Mgeliashvili Salome, Antia Tamara, Sander Josemir W
Caucasus International University, 73 Chargali Str., 0141 Tbilisi, Georgia; Institute of Neurology and Neuropsychology, 83/11 Vazha-Pshavela ave., 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia.
European University, 17, D. Sarajishvili Ave., 0189 Tbilisi, Georgia.
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Jan;162:110166. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110166. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
One of the most significant challenges faced by people with epilepsy is the stigma imposed by the broader community. We aim to assess the dynamics of stigma and the level of misconceptions towards individuals with epilepsy by comparing two studies conducted decades apart.
Awareness-raising campaigns and professional skill development activities were conducted. We utilised a Georgian-adapted structured questionnaire and the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) questionnaire, which had previously been validated in Georgian. A cross-sectional study was conducted. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to develop a predictive model for stigma perception. To compare the two studies, we used the Chi-squared test to examine differences in proportions between the two populations, including the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the difference in proportions. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Of the 1,146 participants, 502 (43.8%) were female, and 207 (18.1%) had a medical education. Higher levels of stigma were observed more frequently among individuals without a medical background. Participants who perceived epilepsy as a psychiatric disorder, a hereditary condition, or a congenital disability exhibited higher levels of stigma. Comparisons between the two studies reveal a significant decrease in the number of individuals who would oppose their child marrying or playing with someone who has epilepsy.
Respondents with medical backgrounds were less likely to express stigma and misconceptions. A comparison of the two studies indicates a statistically significant improvement over the past decade, likely to be partly attributable to regular awareness-raising campaigns.
癫痫患者面临的最重大挑战之一是来自更广泛社区的污名化。我们旨在通过比较相隔数十年进行的两项研究,评估污名化的动态变化以及对癫痫患者的误解程度。
开展了提高认识运动和专业技能发展活动。我们使用了经过格鲁吉亚语改编的结构化问卷以及先前已在格鲁吉亚语中得到验证的癫痫污名量表(SSE)问卷。进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析来建立污名认知的预测模型。为了比较这两项研究,我们使用卡方检验来检验两个人口群体之间比例的差异,包括比例差异的95%置信区间(CI)。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在1146名参与者中,502名(43.8%)为女性,207名(18.1%)接受过医学教育。在没有医学背景的个体中,更高水平的污名化更为常见。将癫痫视为精神疾病、遗传疾病或先天性残疾的参与者表现出更高水平的污名化。两项研究的比较显示,反对自己孩子与癫痫患者结婚或玩耍的人数显著减少。
有医学背景的受访者表达污名和误解的可能性较小。两项研究的比较表明,在过去十年中取得了具有统计学意义的改善,这可能部分归因于定期开展的提高认识运动。