Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedics Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Nov 29;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0.
The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.
Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.
Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).
Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.
Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。我们旨在比较三种倒置空心加压螺钉(ICCS)、股骨颈系统(FNS)和经皮加压钢板(PCCP)的生物力学特性,以确定哪种方法为不稳定股骨颈骨折提供更好的稳定性。
有限元分析和人工骨模型用于建立 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折模型。根据各自的内固定组件,将其分为 ICCS、FNS 和 PCCP 组。在有限元分析中,模型沿股骨颈轴受到垂直轴向载荷(2100 N)和扭转力(10 N × mm)的作用。分析了主要结果,如 Z 轴骨折碎片位移,以及内固定的位移和 von Mises 应力(VMS)分布。此外,人工骨分别在 2°、4°和 6°的角度下逐渐增加垂直轴向压力和扭转力矩。记录股骨头的垂直位移和所需的扭矩值。
有限元分析显示,在单腿站立负荷下,ICCS 的最大 Z 轴骨折碎片位移为 5.060 mm,FNS 为 4.028 mm,PCCP 为 2.796 mm。ICCS 的最大内固定位移为 4.545 mm,FNS 为 3.047 mm,PCCP 为 2.559 mm。峰值 VMS 值为 ICCS 为 512.21 MPa,FNS 为 242.86 MPa,PCCP 为 413.85 MPa。在人工骨上施加逐渐增加的垂直载荷下,ICCS、FNS 和 PCCP 组的平均垂直轴向刚度分别为 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm、415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm 和 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm。在扭转力矩试验中,PCCP 组在 2°、4°和 6°时的扭矩值明显高于 FNS 和 ICCS,FNS 和 ICCS 之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
有限元分析和人工骨模型表明,PCCP 为 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折提供最佳的抗压和旋转稳定性,其次是 FNS,然后是 ICCS。在合成骨中,FNS 和 ICCS 的旋转阻力无显著差异。证据水平 5 级。