Suppr超能文献

股骨颈系统治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析。

Finite element analysis of femoral neck system in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture.

机构信息

Yanbin Teng, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong province, People's Republic of China, Yan Zhang, Department of Nephrology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 15;101(28):e29450. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029450.

Abstract

The optimal treatment strategy for femoral neck fractures remained controversial, especially the Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture of young patients was a challenge. Femoral neck system (FNS) was a newly developed internal fixation for treating femoral neck fracture and this study aimed to compare the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages between FNS and 3 cannulated configuration screws (CCS) with or without an additional medial buttress plate (MBP). In this study, Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture model with an angle of 70° was constructed and 3 different fixation models, FNS, CCS + MBP, CCS alone, were developed. A vertical force of 2100N was applied on the femoral head, then the maximum von Mises stress of whole model, distal femur, femoral head, and internal fixation was recorded, as well as the stress distribution of whole model, proximal fracture section, and internal fixation of the 3 models. Moreover, the maximum displacement of the whole model, distal femur, femoral head, internal fixation, and the relative displacement of the proximal and distal portion was also compared. The maximum von Mises stress value was 318.302 MPa in FNS, 485.226 MPa in CCS + 1/3 plate, and 425.889 MPa in CCS. The FNS showed lowest maximum von Mises stress values in distal part, femoral head, and internal implant. All fixation configurations were observed stress concentrated at the posteroinferior area of cross-section of femoral head and at the fracture section area of implant; however, FNS had more uniform stress distribution. For displacement, the maximum displacement value was 8.5446 mm in FNS, 8.2863 mm in CCS + 1/3 plate, and 8.3590 mm in CCS. However, FNS had higher maximum displacement in femoral head and internal implant, but lower maximum displacement in the distal part of fracture model. The FNS represented a significantly higher relative displacement between the femoral head and distal femur when compared with the other 2 fixation configurations. The newly developed FNS could achieve the dual effect of angular stability and sliding compression for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, which provided superior biomechanical stability than CCS alone and CCS with additional MBP.

摘要

对于股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议,尤其是年轻患者的 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折是一个挑战。股骨颈系统(FNS)是一种新开发的用于治疗股骨颈骨折的内固定物,本研究旨在比较 FNS 与 3 枚空心加压螺钉(CCS)加或不加内侧支撑钢板(MBP)的生物力学优缺点。本研究构建了 70°的 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折模型,开发了 3 种不同的固定模型,即 FNS、CCS+MBP 和 CCS 单独固定。在股骨头施加 2100N 的垂直力,然后记录整个模型、股骨远端、股骨头和内固定的最大 von Mises 应力,以及 3 种模型的整个模型、近端骨折段和内固定的应力分布。此外,还比较了整个模型、股骨远端、股骨头、内固定的最大位移以及近端和远端的相对位移。FNS 的最大 von Mises 应力值为 318.302 MPa,CCS+1/3 钢板为 485.226 MPa,CCS 为 425.889 MPa。FNS 显示远端、股骨头和内植入物的最大 von Mises 应力值最低。所有固定配置均观察到应力集中在股骨头横截面的后下区域和植入物的骨折区域;然而,FNS 的应力分布更加均匀。对于位移,FNS 的最大位移值为 8.5446mm,CCS+1/3 钢板为 8.2863mm,CCS 为 8.3590mm。然而,FNS 在股骨头和内植入物中的最大位移较高,但在骨折模型的远端部分中的最大位移较低。与其他 2 种固定配置相比,FNS 代表了股骨头和股骨远端之间的相对位移显著更高。新开发的 FNS 可实现对 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的角度稳定性和滑动压缩的双重作用,与单独使用 CCS 和 CCS 加额外 MBP 相比,提供了更好的生物力学稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3e/11132412/961f7e41cd6c/medi-101-e29450-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验