Woods Beth, Kearns Ben, Schmitt Laetitia, Jankovic Dina, Rothery Claire, Harnan Sue, Hamilton Jean, Scope Alison, Ren Shijie, Bojke Laura, Wilcox Mark, Hope William, Leonard Colm, Howard Philip, Jenkins David, Ashworth Alan, Bentley Andrew, Sculpher Mark
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Alcuin 'A' Block, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00924-x. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
The UK has recently established subscription-payment agreements for two antimicrobials: cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam. This article summarises the novel value assessments that informed this process and lessons learned for future pricing and funding decisions.
The evaluations used decision modelling to predict population incremental net health effects (INHEs), informed by systematic reviews, evidence syntheses, national surveillance data and structured expert elicitation.
Significant challenges faced during the development of the evaluations led to profound uncertainty in the estimates of INHEs. The value assessment required definition of the population expected to receive the new antimicrobials; estimating value within this heterogenous population; assessing comparative efficacy using antimicrobial susceptibility data due to the absence of relevant clinical data; and predicting population-level benefits despite poor data on current numbers of drug-resistant infections and uncertainties around emerging resistance. Though both antimicrobials offer the potential to treat multi-drug resistant infections, the benefits estimated were modest due to the rarity of true pan-resistance, low life expectancy of the patient population and difficulty of identifying and quantifying additional sources of value.
Assessing the population INHEs of new antimicrobials was complex and resource intensive. Future evaluations should continue to assemble evidence relating to areas of expected usage, patient numbers over time and comparative effectiveness and safety. Projections of patient numbers could be greatly enhanced by the development of national level linked clinical, prescribing and laboratory data. A practical approach to synthesising these data would be to combine expert assessments of key parameters with a simple generic decision model.
英国最近为两种抗菌药物(头孢地尔和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦)制定了订阅付费协议。本文总结了为这一过程提供参考的新颖价值评估以及未来定价和资金决策的经验教训。
评估采用决策模型来预测人群增量净健康效应(INHEs),依据系统评价、证据综合分析、国家监测数据和结构化专家意见。
评估过程中面临的重大挑战导致INHEs估计存在很大不确定性。价值评估需要定义预期接受新抗菌药物的人群;在这个异质人群中估计价值;由于缺乏相关临床数据,利用抗菌药物敏感性数据评估比较疗效;尽管当前耐药感染数量数据不佳且新出现耐药存在不确定性,但仍要预测人群层面的益处。虽然这两种抗菌药物都有治疗多重耐药感染的潜力,但由于真正的泛耐药罕见、患者人群预期寿命低以及难以识别和量化其他价值来源,估计的益处不大。
评估新抗菌药物的人群INHEs复杂且资源密集。未来的评估应继续收集与预期使用领域、不同时间的患者数量以及比较有效性和安全性相关的证据。通过开发国家层面的临床、处方和实验室关联数据,可大大提高患者数量预测。综合这些数据的一种实用方法是将关键参数的专家评估与简单的通用决策模型相结合。