• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人对婚姻、性别角色和相关因素的态度:对婚姻、性别角色的态度。

Young people's attitudes toward marriage, gender roles, and related factors : Attitudes toward marriage, gender roles.

机构信息

Department of Health Care, Sabuncuoğlu Serefeddin Health Services Vocational School, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey.

Vocational School of Health, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):3347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20904-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20904-z
PMID:39616306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608479/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, the effects of university students' sociodemographic characteristics and their thoughts on marriage on their attitudes towards marriage and gender roles were discussed.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed, involving a sample of 1082 university students. The data for this study were collected using a socio-demographic questionnaire, the Inönü Marital Attitude Scale (IMAS), and the Gender Roles Attitude Scale (GRAS). The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Kruskal Wallis Test, and Pearson Correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 20.53 ± 1.96 years, 67.9% were female and 32.1% were male. The participants' mean GRAS total score was 144.93 ± 26.62, and the mean IMAS score was 71.80 ± 16.42. Significant gender-based differences were observed in IMAS and GRAS total/subscale scores (p < 0.001). Furthermore, societal gender roles were found to be significantly correlated with participants' income, views on the distribution of authority between spouses, and opinions on domestic violence. A significant positive correlation was observed between students' IMAS total scores and GRAS egalitarian gender role subscale scores (r = 0.108, p < 0.001). Moreover, IMAS total scores were found to be significantly negatively correlated with GRAS total and female gender role, gender role in marriage, traditional gender role, and male gender role subscale scores (r=-0.252, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The participating students' gender role total scores were found to be very high. Accordingly, as parents of the future, young people are the group that needs to be prioritized, and it is essential to promote their positive attitudes towards marriage and gender equality.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨大学生的社会人口特征和婚姻观念对其婚姻态度和性别角色态度的影响。

方法

采用横断面描述性研究设计,选取 1082 名大学生作为研究对象。采用社会人口学问卷、伊诺努婚姻态度量表(IMAS)和性别角色态度量表(GRAS)收集研究数据。采用描述性统计、Kruskal Wallis 检验和 Pearson 相关分析对数据进行分析。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 20.53±1.96 岁,其中 67.9%为女性,32.1%为男性。参与者的平均 GRAS 总分为 144.93±26.62,IMAS 评分为 71.80±16.42。IMAS 和 GRAS 总分/分量表得分在性别上存在显著差异(p<0.001)。此外,社会性别角色与参与者的收入、配偶之间权力分配的看法以及对家庭暴力的看法显著相关。学生的 IMAS 总分与 GRAS 平等性别角色分量表得分呈显著正相关(r=0.108,p<0.001)。此外,IMAS 总分与 GRAS 总分以及女性性别角色、婚姻中的性别角色、传统性别角色和男性性别角色分量表得分呈显著负相关(r=-0.252,p<0.001)。

结论

研究对象的性别角色总分非常高。因此,作为未来的父母,年轻人是需要优先考虑的群体,必须促进他们对婚姻和性别平等的积极态度。

相似文献

1
Young people's attitudes toward marriage, gender roles, and related factors : Attitudes toward marriage, gender roles.年轻人对婚姻、性别角色和相关因素的态度:对婚姻、性别角色的态度。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):3347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20904-z.
2
Premenstrual syndrome in university students: its correlation with their attitudes toward gender roles.大学生经前期综合征:与他们的性别角色态度的相关性。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Sep;39(3):228-236. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1338265. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Evaluation of the Attitudes of Midwifery Students Towards Gender Roles.助产专业学生对性别角色的态度评估
Soc Work Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;36(7-8):786-794. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1954128. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Attitudes of students studying in various fields related to health services toward gender roles and intimate partner violence.学习健康服务相关领域的学生对性别角色和亲密伴侣暴力的态度。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Jul;57(3):1299-1304. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12690. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Do university students' personality traits affect their attitudes towards gender roles?大学生的人格特质会影响他们对性别角色的态度吗?
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2019 Oct;55(4):562-569. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12375. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
University students' attitudes toward gender roles and infertility: A descriptive and correlational study.大学生对性别角色和不孕不育的态度:描述性和相关性研究。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Oct;58(4):2601-2611. doi: 10.1111/ppc.13100. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
The relationship between decision making and gender roles of students studying in healthcare fields.学生在医疗保健领域学习中的决策制定与性别角色之间的关系。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Apr;58(2):696-705. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12838. Epub 2021 May 9.
8
Attitudes of nursing students toward gender roles: a cross-sectional study.护理专业学生对性别角色的态度:一项横断面研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2018 Jun;54(3):333-344. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1504623. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Association Between Egalitarian Gender Attitudes and Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: Findings from a National Representative Survey.平等主义性别态度与对同性婚姻的态度之间的关联:一项全国代表性调查的结果
J Homosex. 2025 May 12;72(6):1050-1063. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2024.2364227. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Knowledge, attitude and practices associated with COVID-19 among undergraduate students from Malaysian public universities during the endemic phase: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚公立大学本科生在疫情流行阶段对新冠病毒的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19834-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Educational differentials in cohabitors' marriage intentions at different childbearing stages in seven European countries.七个欧洲国家同居者在不同生育阶段结婚意愿的教育差异。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:253-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Men and therapy: critical concepts, theoretical frameworks, and research recommendations.男性与治疗:关键概念、理论框架及研究建议。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;61(6):699-711. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20104.
3
The volution of gender identity.性别认同的演变。 (注:原文中“volution”有误,正确的可能是“evolution”)
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1967 Nov;43(11):1000-18.