Suppr超能文献

机器人后颅窝颅底手术的可行性。

Feasibility of robotic posterior fossa skull base surgery.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

2Department of Neurosurgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Dec 1;57(6):E5. doi: 10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24341.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite its potential advantages, robotic surgery has yet to be applied to skull base procedures. Complex anatomy and restricted access have limited the development of robotic skull base surgery. The authors' aim was to conduct a feasibility study of robotic surgery for posterior fossa skull base lesions.

METHODS

Six silicone-injected postmortem human heads were prepared for the robotic surgery. Because there was no drilling tool with the robot, specimens were dissected in advance using an endoscope and microscope. The following approaches were investigated: 1) supracerebellar-infratentorial; 2) retromastoid; and 3) posterior occipitocervical junction surgeries. For each approach specific anatomical landmarks were identified, and the surgical freedom (vertical distance angle between the tools) was measured.

RESULTS

In the case of the supracerebellar-infratentorial approach, the authors used 3 burrs with 1.5 cm of diameter: 1 paramedian and 2 laterally. The view of the pineal region was visualized, and sufficient surgical freedom of both tools was secured. The median vertical distance was 1.2 cm (range 1.1-1.8 cm), and the median angle between the tools was 105° (range 92°-110°). On the other hand, in the retromastoid approach, with a single burr 2.5 cm in diameter, the root exit zone of the facial nerve was barely visible, and a space for tools to access was not secured. The median vertical distance was 0.8 cm (range 0.6-1.0 cm), and the median angle between the tools was 10° (range 6°-12°). In the case of the posterior occipitocervical junction approach, the authors used the 3 tubular retractors, 1 in the middle and 2 laterally. Even though the space was narrow, the medulla and adjacent nerves could be identified, and a moderate level of surgical freedom could be obtained for tool mobilization. The median vertical distance was 1.6 cm (range 1.2-2.5 cm), and the median angle between the tools was 90° (range 88°-95°).

CONCLUSIONS

Although robotic surgery has yet to be applied to neurosurgery, it is expected to be helpful in posterior fossa skull base surgery if appropriate tools can be developed.

摘要

目的

尽管机器人手术具有潜在优势,但尚未应用于颅底手术。复杂的解剖结构和有限的手术入路限制了机器人颅底手术的发展。作者的目的是对机器人用于后颅窝颅底病变的手术进行可行性研究。

方法

对 6 个硅胶注入的尸体头颅进行了机器人手术准备。由于机器人没有钻头工具,因此使用内窥镜和显微镜预先对标本进行了解剖。研究了以下入路:1)幕上-幕下;2)乳突后;和 3)后枕颈交界区手术。对于每种入路,确定了特定的解剖学标志,并测量了手术自由度(工具之间的垂直距离角度)。

结果

在幕上-幕下入路中,作者使用了 3 个直径为 1.5 厘米的钻头:1 个正中位和 2 个侧位。松果体区域的视野得以可视化,并且两个工具都有足够的手术自由度。中间垂直距离为 1.2 厘米(范围 1.1-1.8 厘米),工具之间的中间角度为 105°(范围 92°-110°)。另一方面,在乳突后入路中,使用直径为 2.5 厘米的单个钻头,面神经根部出口区几乎看不见,并且没有为工具进入留出空间。中间垂直距离为 0.8 厘米(范围 0.6-1.0 厘米),工具之间的中间角度为 10°(范围 6°-12°)。在后枕颈交界区入路中,作者使用了 3 个管状牵开器,1 个在中间,2 个在两侧。尽管空间狭窄,但可以识别出延髓和相邻的神经,并且可以获得用于工具移动的适度手术自由度。中间垂直距离为 1.6 厘米(范围 1.2-2.5 厘米),工具之间的中间角度为 90°(范围 88°-95°)。

结论

尽管机器人手术尚未应用于神经外科,但如果能够开发出合适的工具,预计它将有助于后颅窝颅底手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验