• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

别去想一头粉色大象:视觉想象的个体差异预示着非自愿意象及其神经关联。

Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates.

作者信息

Arnold Derek H, Hutchinson Mary, Bouyer Loren N, Schwarzkopf D Samuel, Pellicano Elizabeth, Saurels Blake W

机构信息

Perception Lab, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia.

Perception Lab, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Cortex. 2025 Feb;183:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020
PMID:39616965
Abstract

There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typically been framed as a cognitive deficit, it is possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts - which are experienced as an imagined sensation. Here, we report on a direct test of that proposition. We asked people to either imagine, or to try not to imagine having a range of audio and visual experiences while we recorded their brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). Ratings describing the subjective vividness of different people's voluntary visualisations predicted if they would also report having involuntary visualisations - such as an imagined experience of seeing a pink elephant when they were asked not to. Both the prevalence of different people's involuntary visualisations and the typical vividness of their visualisations could be predicted by neural correlates of disinhibition, working memory, and neural feedback. Our data suggest that the propensity of people to have involuntary visual experiences can scale with the subjective intensity of their typical experiences of visualisation.

摘要

人们产生想象视觉体验的能力存在显著差异,从终生无法做到(先天性phantasia)到声称拥有与实际所见一样生动的想象体验的人(超phantasia)。虽然先天性phantasia通常被视为一种认知缺陷,但想象视觉感觉的能力较弱或缺失,可能会被对侵入性思维的更高抵抗力所平衡——侵入性思维会被体验为一种想象感觉。在此,我们报告对这一命题的直接测试。我们让人们在我们用脑电图(EEG)记录他们的大脑活动时,要么想象,要么尝试不去想象一系列的音频和视觉体验。描述不同人自主想象的主观生动程度的评分,预测了他们是否也会报告有非自主想象——比如当被要求不要想象时,却看到了一头粉色大象的想象体验。不同人的非自主想象的发生率及其想象的典型生动程度,都可以通过去抑制、工作记忆和神经反馈的神经关联来预测。我们的数据表明,人们产生非自主视觉体验的倾向可能与他们典型想象体验的主观强度成比例。

相似文献

1
Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates.别去想一头粉色大象:视觉想象的个体差异预示着非自愿意象及其神经关联。
Cortex. 2025 Feb;183:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Objective priming from pre-imagining inputs before binocular rivalry presentations does not predict individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences.在双眼竞争呈现之前,来自预想象输入的目标启动并不能预测想象体验主观强度的个体差异。
Cognition. 2025 Mar;256:106048. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106048. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Vividness of Visual Imagery Depends on the Neural Overlap with Perception in Visual Areas.视觉意象的生动程度取决于与视觉区域感知的神经重叠。
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1367-1373. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
4
The vividness of visualisations and autistic trait expression are not strongly associated.视觉想象的生动程度与自闭症特质的表现并没有紧密关联。
Conscious Cogn. 2025 Mar;129:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103821. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
5
Phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia: Empirical data and conceptual considerations.幻觉、无幻觉和超幻觉:经验数据和概念思考。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105819. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105819. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.在涉及意象的神经心理学任务中,先天性失像者和具有典型意象者之间只有微小的差异。
Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:180-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
Visual mental imagery in typical imagers and in aphantasia: A millimeter-scale 7-T fMRI study.典型成像者和心盲症患者的视觉心理意象:一项毫米级7-T功能磁共振成像研究。
Cortex. 2025 Apr;185:113-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
8
Visual working memory performance in aphantasia.空想性错视觉者的视觉工作记忆表现。
Cortex. 2018 Aug;105:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Subjective vividness of motor imagery has a neural signature in human premotor and parietal cortex.运动想象的主观生动性在人类运动前皮质和顶叶皮质中有神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.073. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia.盲视思维:空想者中不存在感官视觉意象。
Cortex. 2018 Aug;105:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 28.