Suppr超能文献

在涉及意象的神经心理学任务中,先天性失像者和具有典型意象者之间只有微小的差异。

Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.

Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, USA.

出版信息

Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:180-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Abstract

Aphantasia describes the experience of individuals who self-report a lack of voluntary visual imagery. It is not yet known whether individuals with aphantasia show deficits in cognitive and neuropsychological tasks thought to relate to aspects of visual imagery, including Spatial Span, One Touch Stocking of Cambridge, Pattern Recognition Memory, Verbal Recognition Memory and Mental Rotation. Twenty individuals with congenital aphantasia (VVIQ < 25) were identified and matched on measures of age and IQ to twenty individuals with typical imagery (VVIQ > 35). A group difference was found in the One Touch Stocking of Cambridge task for response time, but not accuracy, when the number of imagined moves that participants had to hold in their heads to complete the task increased. Similarly, a group difference in response time was apparent in the mental rotation task, but only in the subgroup of aphantasic participants who reported a severe deficit in visual imagery (VVIQ score of 16). These results suggest that the cognitive profile of people without imagery does not greatly differ from those with typical imagery when examined by group. In addition, the severity of aphantasia (and VVIQ criterion) may be an important factor to consider when investigating differences in imagery experience. Overall, this study raises questions about whether or not aphantasia represents a difference in cognitive function or in conscious experience.

摘要

幻像缺失描述了个体自我报告的缺乏自愿视觉意象的体验。目前还不清楚是否存在幻像缺失的个体在认知和神经心理学任务中表现出缺陷,这些任务被认为与视觉意象的各个方面有关,包括空间广度、剑桥一次性套叠测验、模式识别记忆、言语识别记忆和心理旋转。确定了 20 名先天性幻像缺失者(VVIQ<25),并根据年龄和智商与 20 名具有典型意象者(VVIQ>35)进行匹配。当参与者在完成任务时必须在脑海中想象的移动次数增加时,在剑桥一次性套叠测验的反应时间方面发现了组间差异,但在准确性方面没有差异。类似地,在心理旋转任务中也出现了组间反应时间的差异,但仅在报告视觉意象严重缺失的幻像缺失参与者亚组中出现(VVIQ 得分为 16)。这些结果表明,当通过组进行检查时,没有意象的人的认知特征与具有典型意象的人没有很大差异。此外,幻像缺失的严重程度(以及 VVIQ 标准)可能是在研究意象体验差异时需要考虑的一个重要因素。总的来说,这项研究提出了关于幻像缺失是否代表认知功能或意识体验的差异的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验