Feder Ami, Graithzer Yair, Pinhas Michal
Department of Psychology, Ariel University, 4070000, Ariel, Israel.
Psychol Res. 2024 Dec 2;89(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02050-8.
Past research indicates that concepts of infinity are not fully understood. In countably infinite sets, infinity is presumed to be perceived as larger than any finite natural number. This study explored whether symbolic representations of infinity are processed as such through contrasts with Arabic and verbal written numbers. Comparisons between the infinity word and number words were responded to faster than comparisons of two number words, but not when the infinity symbol was solely compared to Arabic numbers. Moreover, infinity comparisons yielded distance-like effects, suggesting that infinity (both word and symbol) can be misconceived as a "natural number" closer to larger numbers than small ones. These findings demonstrate difficulty perceiving the physically smallest stimulus (∞) as the upper end-value and seem to reflect a limited understanding of symbolic forms of infinity among adults. They further highlight the impact of notation and numerical syntax on how we process symbolic numerical information.
过去的研究表明,人们对无穷的概念并未完全理解。在可数无穷集合中,无穷被假定为比任何有限自然数都大。本研究通过与阿拉伯数字和书面文字数字进行对比,探究无穷的符号表示是否也被如此处理。无穷词与数字词之间的比较比两个数字词之间的比较反应更快,但当无穷符号仅与阿拉伯数字进行比较时则不然。此外,无穷比较产生了类似距离的效应,这表明无穷(词和符号)可能被误解为一个“自然数”,与较大数字相比,它比小数字更接近大数字。这些发现表明,将物理上最小的刺激(∞)视为上限值存在困难,这似乎反映了成年人对无穷符号形式的理解有限。它们进一步凸显了记数法和数字句法对我们处理符号数字信息方式的影响。