Niemi-Murola Leila, Vanhanen Aija, Akrén Outi, Karihtala Peeter, Pöyhiä Reino
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Nov 21;14:27. doi: 10.12688/mep.20013.4. eCollection 2024.
Most studies on palliative medicine (PM) undergraduate education have focused on contents and organizational issues but not the outcome. Students' learning outcomes should be studied to improve teaching in medical schools.
A questionnaire about perceived PM education and attitudes on palliative care (PC) was sent to 543 last year students in all five Finnish medical schools in 2018-2019. In total, 175 (32 %) responses were received from four universities. The students evaluated both the quantity and quality of their PM teaching, implementation of European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) guidelines and their satisfaction to the training. There were two palliative case scenarios, and the students were asked to find the best treatment option. In addition, students´ attitudes towards end-of-life (EOL) care issues were examined.
In the Finnish universities, PM education was available mainly integrated with oncology, geriatrics, and general medicine. A total of two universities also offered a specific PM course. In average, 50-70% of the EAPC curriculum was covered by lectures, small-group teaching, seminars, and bedside teaching with significant differences between faculties. Only 30-60 % of students were satisfied with the education received. The highest rankings were given in the universities with a special PM course. Students from these universities expressed less anxiety in facing EOL issues.
In Finland, the coverage of EAPC curriculum is satisfactory, but the PM education is mainly given integrated with other specialties. The dedicated course on PM was associated with increased perceived knowledge and satisfaction of PM education. However, PM training was not associated with students' attitudes on PC.
大多数关于姑息医学本科教育的研究都集中在内容和组织问题上,而非结果。应该研究学生的学习成果以改进医学院校的教学。
2018 - 2019年,向芬兰所有五所医学院校的543名高年级学生发送了一份关于姑息医学教育认知和对姑息治疗态度的问卷。总共收到了来自四所大学的175份(32%)回复。学生们对姑息医学教学的数量和质量、欧洲姑息治疗协会(EAPC)指南的实施情况以及他们对培训的满意度进行了评估。有两个姑息治疗病例场景,要求学生找出最佳治疗方案。此外,还考察了学生对临终关怀问题的态度。
在芬兰的大学中,姑息医学教育主要与肿瘤学、老年医学和普通医学相结合。共有两所大学还开设了专门的姑息医学课程。平均而言,EAPC课程的50 - 70%通过讲座、小组教学、研讨会和床边教学进行讲授,各学院之间存在显著差异。只有30 - 60%的学生对所接受的教育感到满意。开设专门姑息医学课程的大学排名最高。这些大学的学生在面对临终问题时表现出较少的焦虑。
在芬兰,EAPC课程的覆盖范围令人满意,但姑息医学教育主要与其他专业相结合。专门的姑息医学课程与对姑息医学教育的认知度提高和满意度增加相关。然而,姑息医学培训与学生对姑息治疗的态度无关。