Xu Zhangyu, Zhong Quanzhen, Xing Fei, Zhu Yuanliang, Hu Yue, Huang Maomao, Zhou Mouwang, Wang Jianxiong
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 Nov 21;2024:8500317. doi: 10.1155/mi/8500317. eCollection 2024.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) have both been demonstrated as effective at alleviating neuropathic pain (NP). However, the comparative efficacy of these two neuromodulation techniques and the specific neural mechanisms underlying their effects remain unclear. This study aims to compare the efficacy of rTMS in the PFC and TENS in mitigating peripheral NP and to investigate the impact of rTMS on neuroinflammation. Eighteen adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: NP (chronic constriction injury [CCI] group, = 6), rTMS ( = 6), and TENS ( = 6). rTMS was applied to the PFC, while TENS was applied to the right hind limb of the rats 1 week postoperatively. This treatment regimen was administered once daily, 5 days a week, for 4 consecutive weeks. The paw withdrawal mechanical threshold (PWMT) was measured to assess the pain-alleviating effects of rTMS and TENS. We further conducted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to measure the levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in the PFC and L4-L6 spinal cord to evaluate their impact on neuroinflammation. Additionally, we examined transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) expression in the PFC and the L4‒L6 spinal cord using western blotting and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to explore the potential mechanisms involved. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the sciatic nerve was further performed to observe pathological changes. Compared to the CCI group, both the rTMS and TENS groups exhibited a significant increase in PWMT, with the rTMS group demonstrating a notably greater PWMT than the TENS group. Furthermore, rTMS treatment triggered a significant decrease in IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α levels in the PFC and spinal cord, while TENS only decreased IL-1β expression in these regions. In both treatment groups, TRPV1 expression was significantly lower in the spinal cord, while H&E staining indicated improved pathological manifestations in the sciatic nerve. Both rTMS and TENS effectively ameliorated CCI-induced NP, with rTMS of the PFC showing superior performance. Both treatments reduced TRPV1 expression and suppressed neuroinflammation in the spinal cord, indicating that this may be one of the mechanisms through which they exert their therapeutic effects.
前额叶皮质(PFC)的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经皮电神经刺激(TENS)均已被证明在缓解神经性疼痛(NP)方面有效。然而,这两种神经调节技术的比较疗效及其作用的具体神经机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较PFC区域rTMS和TENS减轻外周NP的疗效,并研究rTMS对神经炎症的影响。18只成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被随机分为三组:NP组(慢性缩窄损伤[CCI]组,n = 6)、rTMS组(n = 6)和TENS组(n = 6)。rTMS应用于PFC,而TENS在术后1周应用于大鼠的右后肢。该治疗方案每天给药1次,每周5天,连续给药4周。测量爪部撤离机械阈值(PWMT)以评估rTMS和TENS的止痛效果。我们进一步进行酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),以测量PFC和L4-L6脊髓中白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的水平,以评估它们对神经炎症的影响。此外,我们使用蛋白质免疫印迹法和实时定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)检测PFC和L4-L6脊髓中瞬时受体电位香草酸亚型1(TRPV1)的表达,以探索其中涉及的潜在机制。进一步对坐骨神经进行苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色,以观察病理变化。与CCI组相比,rTMS组和TENS组的PWMT均显著增加,rTMS组的PWMT明显高于TENS组。此外,rTMS治疗使PFC和脊髓中IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α水平显著降低,而TENS仅降低了这些区域中IL-1β的表达。在两个治疗组中,脊髓中TRPV1的表达均显著降低,而H&E染色显示坐骨神经的病理表现有所改善。rTMS和TENS均能有效改善CCI诱导的NP,PFC区域的rTMS表现更优。两种治疗均降低了TRPV1的表达并抑制了脊髓中的神经炎症,表明这可能是它们发挥治疗作用的机制之一。