Gantz Liat, Shneor Einat, Shaw Natalie, Doron Ravid
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 26;18:3473-3484. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S492994. eCollection 2024.
Fusional vergence ranges (FVR) quantify the oculomotor system's ability to overcome heterophoria, playing a critical role in diagnosis and treatment. This study investigated the effect of prism order on near vertical FVR using the smooth and step methods.
Normal participants were randomly assigned to either the smooth or step testing method and to Base-Up (BU, infravergence) first or Base Down (BD, supravergence) first prism type. After an hour, they crossed over to the alternative testing method and prism-type. The mean of two consecutive measurements of break and recovery values for one eye in each of the 16 experimental conditions were compared using the Friedman test with post-hoc Bonferroni correction, and non-parametric Bland and Altman analysis.
The mean break/recovery values of 27 participants (mean age: 22.5±2.0, range: 20-29, 20 female) when BU or BD were measured first were BU: 4.20±1.15/3.07±1.04 and BD: 4.20±1.21/3.00±0.96 for step, and BU: 4.31±0.98/2.97±0.85 and BD: 4.15±1.14/2.70±0.87 for smooth methods, respectively. When measured second, they were BU: 3.74±1.02/2.63±0.93and BD: 3.85±1.09/2.64±1.06 for step, BU: 3.91±0.99/2.73±0.93 and BD: 3.81±1.04/2.54±1.04 for smooth, respectively. The Friedman test found a significant effect of prism order on break values of the smooth (p<0.001) and step (p<0.02) methods, and recovery values of the step method (p<0.005), but post-hoc tests showed no significant differences. Mean differences were below 0.50 indicating clinical insignificance.
Unlike horizontal FVR, prism order does not affect near vertical FVR using the smooth and step. This simplifies clinical assessment and suggests that horizontal and vertical fusion systems may be treated as separate entities.
融合性聚散范围(FVR)量化了眼球运动系统克服隐斜视的能力,在诊断和治疗中起着关键作用。本研究使用平滑法和阶梯法探究了棱镜顺序对近垂直FVR的影响。
正常参与者被随机分配至平滑测试法或阶梯测试法,以及先进行上转棱镜(BU,下转隐斜)或先进行下转棱镜(BD,上转隐斜)测试。一小时后,他们交叉采用另一种测试方法和棱镜类型。在16种实验条件下,对每只眼睛的破裂值和恢复值进行连续两次测量的平均值,采用Friedman检验并进行事后Bonferroni校正,以及非参数Bland和Altman分析。
27名参与者(平均年龄:22.5±2.0,范围:20 - 29岁,20名女性)在首次测量BU或BD时,阶梯法中BU的破裂/恢复平均值为4.20±1.15/3.07±1.04,BD为4.20±1.21/3.00±0.96;平滑法中BU为4.31±0.98/2.97±0.85,BD为4.15±1.14/2.70±0.87。在第二次测量时,阶梯法中BU为3.74±1.02/2.63±0.93,BD为3.85±1.09/2.64±1.06;平滑法中BU为3.91±0.99/2.73±0.93,BD为3.81±1.04/2.54±1.04。Friedman检验发现棱镜顺序对平滑法(p<0.001)和阶梯法(p<0.02)的破裂值以及阶梯法的恢复值(p<0.005)有显著影响,但事后检验未显示出显著差异。平均差异低于0.50,表明临床意义不显著。
与水平FVR不同,使用平滑法和阶梯法时,棱镜顺序不影响近垂直FVR。这简化了临床评估,并表明水平和垂直融合系统可能可视为独立的实体。