Réblová Martina, Nekvindová Jana, Kolařík Miroslav, Jurjević Željko, Kolář Michal, Hubka Vít
Department of Taxonomy, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic.
Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, University Hospital Hradec Králové, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic University Hospital Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic.
MycoKeys. 2024 Nov 21;110:319-360. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.110.136844. eCollection 2024.
In this study, we assessed the phylogenetic relationships among members of and the morphologically similar genus , currently classified within the Sordariomycetes. Our phylogenetic analyses, utilising three and five gene markers, revealed that species from these two genera are congeneric, supporting the transfer of to . Consequently, we propose two new combinations: and In addition, we identified two cryptic species within the species complex, which are described as and Traditional micromorphological characters have proven insufficient for differentiating these new species; however, they are clearly distinguishable by molecular data, particularly using the internal transcribed spacer region ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS) of the nuclear rRNA cistron, and genes encoding the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (), and translation elongation factor 1-α () as primary and secondary barcodes. This study provides new insights into the morphological characteristics of , identifying the ascogenous system as an important diagnostic trait at the generic level, which distinguishes from morphologically similar fungi. is currently recognised with eight species. We also investigated the relationship between and the closely related . The lack of statistical support in the Maximum likelihood analysis is discussed and the inclusion of in Barbatosphaeriaceae is not supported. is accepted as a genus , while Barbatosphaeriaceae remains a monotypic family. The global diversity of is inferred from metabarcoding data and published field observations. Biogeographic analysis indicates that members of are widespread, found in soil and decaying wood, as well as in air, dust, roots, shoots, and water across temperate, subtropical and tropical regions in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. We are concurrently publishing whole-genome analyses of three ex-type strains of , i.e. , and . This effort aims to establish a new standard for high-quality taxonomic studies, which, in accordance with current trends, should incorporate whole-genome sequencing data for future research and application. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating morphological, biogeographic and molecular data for accurate species delineation and highlight the complexity within the genus .
在本研究中,我们评估了[属名1]成员与形态相似的[属名2]属(目前归类于粪壳菌纲)之间的系统发育关系。我们利用三个和五个基因标记进行系统发育分析,结果表明这两个属的物种是同属的,支持将[属名1]转移到[属名2]。因此,我们提出了两个新组合:[新组合1]和[新组合2]。此外,我们在[物种名]物种复合体中鉴定出两个隐存物种,分别描述为[新物种名1]和[新物种名2]。传统的微观形态特征已被证明不足以区分这些新物种;然而,它们可以通过分子数据清楚地区分,特别是使用核核糖体RNA顺反子的内部转录间隔区ITS1 - 5.8S - ITS2(ITS),以及编码RNA聚合酶II第二大亚基([基因名1])和翻译延伸因子1 - α([基因名2])的基因作为主要和次要条形码。本研究为[属名2]的形态特征提供了新的见解,确定产囊体系统是该属水平上的一个重要诊断特征,它将[属名2]与形态相似的真菌区分开来。[属名2]目前被认可有八个物种。我们还研究了[属名2]与密切相关的[属名3]之间的关系。讨论了最大似然分析中缺乏统计支持的情况,并且不支持将[属名3]归入巴巴球壳菌科。[属名3]被接受为一个属,而巴巴球壳菌科仍然是一个单型科。从宏条形码数据和已发表的实地观察推断[属名2]的全球多样性。生物地理分析表明,[属名2]的成员分布广泛,存在于土壤、腐朽木材以及空气、灰尘、根、茎和水中,分布于北半球和南半球的温带、亚热带和热带地区。我们同时发表了三个[属名2]外模式菌株的全基因组分析,即[菌株名1]、[菌株名2]和[菌株名3]。这项工作旨在建立高质量分类学研究的新标准,按照当前趋势,未来的研究和应用应纳入全基因组测序数据。我们的研究结果强调了整合形态、生物地理和分子数据以准确划分物种的重要性,并突出了[属名2]属内的复杂性。