Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Dec;8(6):1404-1412. doi: 10.1002/cre2.637. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
To compare the marginal and internal fit and fracture resistance of three-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated by additive, subtractive, and conventional methods.
Eighty 3-unit FDPs were fabricated on metal dies of the maxillary right second premolar and second molar by four different techniques (n = 20): The direct method by using autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), indirect method by the compression molding technique, subtractive manufacturing by using PMMA blocks, and additive manufacturing by using digital light processing technology. The adaptation of restorations at the marginal, axial, cuspal, and fossa areas was assessed by using the silicone replica technique. After thermocycling and cyclic loading, the fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA, and Tukey test (α = .05).
The mean gap measured in the additive group was lower than that in all other groups at all points (p < .05); however, the difference in the marginal gap with the subtractive group was not significant (p = .995). The mean marginal and axial gaps in the subtractive group were significantly lower than the corresponding values in both conventional groups (p < .05). A significant difference existed between all groups regarding the mean cuspal and fossa gaps (p < .05). The mean fracture resistance of the additive group was significantly higher than that of indirect (p = .018) and direct (p < .001) groups, and the fracture resistance of the subtractive group was significantly higher than that of the direct group (p = .020).
The digitally fabricated provisional FDPs showed superior marginal and internal fit and higher fracture resistance than the conventionally fabricated FDPs. Between the digital methods, the additive technique yielded superior internal fit.
比较三种方法(添加剂制造、减法制造和传统方法)制作的三单位临时固定义齿(FDP)的边缘和内部适合性及抗折强度。
使用聚合自聚物聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的直接法、压缩成型技术的间接法、PMMA 块的减法制造和数字光处理技术的添加剂制造,在上颌右侧第二前磨牙和第二磨牙的金属模具上制作 80 个三单位 FDP(n=20)。使用硅橡胶印模技术评估修复体在边缘、轴向、牙尖和窝沟区域的适合性。经过热循环和循环加载后,使用万能试验机测量抗折强度。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)、方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。
添加剂组的平均间隙在所有点均低于其他组(p<0.05);然而,与减法组的边缘间隙差异无统计学意义(p=0.995)。减法组的平均边缘和轴向间隙明显低于传统组(p<0.05)。所有组之间的牙尖和窝沟平均间隙均存在显著差异(p<0.05)。添加剂组的平均抗折强度明显高于间接组(p=0.018)和直接组(p<0.001),减法组的抗折强度明显高于直接组(p=0.020)。
与传统制造的 FDP 相比,数字化制造的临时 FDP 具有更好的边缘和内部适合性以及更高的抗折强度。在数字方法之间,添加剂技术具有更好的内部适合性。