• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科收治的肝硬化合并自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者中平均血小板体积的诊断准确性

Diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis presented to the emergency department.

作者信息

Naeimi Bafghi Neda, Torabi Mehdi, Ashkar Fatemeh, Mirzaee Moghaddameh

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Caspian J Intern Med. 2024 Oct 22;16(1):151-157. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.1.151. eCollection 2025 Winter.

DOI:10.22088/cjim.16.1.151
PMID:39619750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11607127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume (MPV) in predicting SBP in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytical, and retrospective study conducted on cirrhotic patients with abdominal ascites referred to the emergency department (ED) over a 1-year period. The cirrhotic patients with ascites were divided into two groups with or without SBP. The diagnostic accuracy of MPV for detecting SBP was measured and compared with the analysis of the ascites fluid obtained by paracentesis as a gold standard procedure in the absence of any secondary causes of peritonitis. The required data were documented in a checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients, 126 with SBP and 126 without SBP, were included in the study. The mean MPV in these patients was 8.36 ± 0.92 fL. Patients with SBP had a significantly longer duration of cirrhosis, more severe fever and abdominal pain, and higher ascites WBC and PMN counts and higher mean MPV (p<001). At the most appropriate cut-off point (i.e., 8.3 fL), MPV provided the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracy of 69.84%, 53.97%, 60.27%, 64.15%, and 61.90%, respectively, for the diagnosis of SBP. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that MPV had an acceptable diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.677).

CONCLUSION

Mean platelet volume, as a non-invasive, simple, and accessible laboratory parameter, with acceptable diagnostic accuracy in cirrhotic patients with ascites may have a predictive role in the diagnosis of SBP.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨平均血小板体积(MPV)对肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的诊断准确性。

方法

这是一项对因腹水而转诊至急诊科的肝硬化患者进行的为期1年的观察性、分析性和回顾性研究。将有腹水的肝硬化患者分为有或无SBP的两组。测量MPV对检测SBP的诊断准确性,并与在无任何继发性腹膜炎病因的情况下通过腹腔穿刺术获得的腹水分析结果进行比较,腹腔穿刺术为金标准程序。所需数据记录在检查表中。

结果

本研究共纳入252例患者,其中126例有SBP,126例无SBP。这些患者的平均MPV为8.36±0.92fL。有SBP的患者肝硬化病程明显更长,发热和腹痛更严重,腹水白细胞和中性粒细胞计数更高,平均MPV也更高(p<0.01)。在最合适的截断点(即8.3fL)时,MPV对SBP诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为69.84%、53.97%、60.27%、64.15%和61.90%。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线显示MPV具有可接受的诊断准确性(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.677)。

结论

平均血小板体积作为一种无创、简单且易于获取的实验室参数,在有腹水的肝硬化患者中具有可接受的诊断准确性,可能在SBP的诊断中具有预测作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb1/11607127/a795d160fb26/cjim-16-151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb1/11607127/a795d160fb26/cjim-16-151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb1/11607127/a795d160fb26/cjim-16-151-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of mean platelet volume in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis presented to the emergency department.急诊科收治的肝硬化合并自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者中平均血小板体积的诊断准确性
Caspian J Intern Med. 2024 Oct 22;16(1):151-157. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.1.151. eCollection 2025 Winter.
2
Mean platelet volume is a useful indicator of systemic inflammation in cirrhotic patients with ascitic fluid infection.平均血小板体积是腹水感染肝硬化患者全身炎症的一个有用指标。
Ann Hepatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;12(2):294-300.
3
Platelet indices and inflammatory markers as diagnostic predictors for ascitic fluid infection.血小板指标和炎症标志物作为腹水感染的诊断预测指标。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;26(12):1342-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000202.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ascites Fluid Gross Appearance in Detection of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.腹水外观在自发性细菌性腹膜炎检测中的诊断准确性
Emerg (Tehran). 2014 Summer;2(3):138-40.
5
Validation of a new simple scoring system to predict spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.验证一种新的简单评分系统,以预测肝硬化和腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02919-9.
6
Ascitic Fluid Lactate Level as a Predictor of Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients Having Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP).腹水乳酸水平作为肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)患者死亡率的预测指标。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):e53243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53243. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
[The predictive value of end-stage liver disease model for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites].[终末期肝病模型对肝硬化腹水患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预测价值]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;48(8):629-32.
8
Mean platelet volume as a novel predictor of systemic inflammatory response in cirrhotic patients with culture-negative neutrocytic ascites.平均血小板体积作为培养阴性中性粒细胞性腹水肝硬化患者全身炎症反应的新型预测指标。
World J Hepatol. 2015 May 8;7(7):1001-6. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i7.1001.
9
The role of serum procalcitonin levels in predicting ascitic fluid infection in hospitalized cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.血清降钙素原水平在预测住院肝硬化和非肝硬化患者腹水感染中的作用。
Int J Med Sci. 2013 Aug 20;10(10):1367-74. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6014. eCollection 2013.
10
Can platelets indices and blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio be used as predictors for diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in decompensated post hepatitis liver cirrhosis?血小板参数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值能否用于预测失代偿期肝炎后肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的诊断?
Egypt J Immunol. 2022 Oct;29(4):12-24.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrospective Investigation of Factors Affecting Mortality in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.自发性细菌性腹膜炎死亡率影响因素的回顾性调查
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2023 Jan-Jun;13(1):5-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1387.
2
Emergency medicine updates: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.急诊医学更新:自发性细菌性腹膜炎。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 May 13.
3
Correlation of Clinically-Suspected Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) With Laboratory-Confirmed SBP in Portosystemic Encephalopathy Patients.
门体分流性脑病患者临床疑似自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)与实验室确诊SBP的相关性
Cureus. 2022 Nov 5;14(11):e31120. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31120. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Can platelets indices and blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio be used as predictors for diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in decompensated post hepatitis liver cirrhosis?血小板参数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值能否用于预测失代偿期肝炎后肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的诊断?
Egypt J Immunol. 2022 Oct;29(4):12-24.
5
An Epidemiological Meta-Analysis on the Worldwide Prevalence, Resistance, and Outcomes of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎全球患病率、耐药性及转归的流行病学荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 5;8:693652. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.693652. eCollection 2021.
6
Patients with cirrhosis and SBP: Increase in multidrug-resistant organisms and complications.肝硬化伴 SBP 患者:耐药菌增加和并发症。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Feb;50(2):e13198. doi: 10.1111/eci.13198. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria: an update of epidemiology and antimicrobial treatments.由革兰氏阴性菌引起的自发性细菌性腹膜炎:流行病学和抗菌治疗的更新。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;13(7):683-692. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1621167. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
[Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis].[自发性细菌性腹膜炎]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 25;72(2):56-63. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2018.72.2.56.
9
Microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A study of two Dutch cohorts at a 10-year interval.自发性细菌性腹膜炎的微生物学及抗生素敏感性模式:一项对两个荷兰队列间隔10年的研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 May;6(4):614-621. doi: 10.1177/2050640617744456. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Diagnostic validity of flow cytometry vs manual counting of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.流式细胞术与手工计数多形核白细胞在自发性细菌性腹膜炎诊断中的有效性
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jun;32(5):e22395. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22395. Epub 2018 Jan 31.