Brown Nicholas, Struck Kathryn, Romo Terry, Koek Wouter, Everett Garcia Ashley, Fredrickson Mark, Trbovich Michelle
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
South Texas Veteran's Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Fall;30(4):57-65. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00001. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at increased risk of renal insufficiency, so their renal function must regularly be monitored. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is challenging as it requires measuring clearance of exogenous markers, which is impractical in most clinical settings. Thus, equations have been formulated to estimate GFR that utilize serum creatinine (Cr) or cystatin C (CysC).
Given loss of muscle mass after SCI, we hypothesized equations using CysC would be more accurate than those using Cr after SCI.
Fifty-eight persons (51 male/7 female; age 22-87 years) with SCI level C2-L1/AIS A-D were enrolled. Serum CysC and Cr, 24-hour urine creatinine (24hrUCr) and 24-hour urine urea (24hrUurea) were collected. Average of the 24hrUCr clearance and 24hrUurea clearance was calculated (AvgCl). Six GFR estimating equations were compared to AvgCl. For each equation, mean bias (AvgCl - eGFR) was calculated followed by the Pearson correlation calculation between AvgCl and eGFR. In addition, the percentage of estimated values within 15%, 30%, and 50% of AvgCl values are reported for each estimating equation.
2012 CKD-EPI CysC equation (bias 9.32 mg/dL, 95% CI, -1.23 to -17.41) was the most accurate predictor of GFR. This model accurately predicted GFR of 81%, 57%, and 33% within ±50%, ±30%, and ±15% of the AvgCl, respectively. : In persons with SCI, the CKD-EPI 2012 CysC equation, which uses cystatin C rather than creatinine, is the most accurate of the six equations tested in estimating GFR in persons with SCI.
脊髓损伤(SCI)患者肾功能不全风险增加,因此必须定期监测其肾功能。肾小球滤过率(GFR)评估具有挑战性,因为它需要测量外源性标志物的清除率,这在大多数临床环境中是不切实际的。因此,已制定了利用血清肌酐(Cr)或胱抑素C(CysC)来估算GFR的方程。
鉴于SCI后肌肉量减少,我们假设使用CysC的方程在SCI后比使用Cr的方程更准确。
纳入58例SCI水平为C2-L1/AIS A-D的患者(51例男性/7例女性;年龄22-87岁)。收集血清CysC和Cr、24小时尿肌酐(24hrUCr)和24小时尿尿素(24hrUurea)。计算24hrUCr清除率和24hrUurea清除率的平均值(AvgCl)。将六个GFR估算方程与AvgCl进行比较。对于每个方程,计算平均偏差(AvgCl - eGFR),然后计算AvgCl与eGFR之间的Pearson相关性。此外,报告每个估算方程的估算值在AvgCl值的±15%、±30%和±50%范围内的百分比。
2012年慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组织(CKD-EPI)CysC方程(偏差9.32mg/dL,95%CI,-1.23至-17.41)是GFR最准确的预测指标。该模型分别在AvgCl的±50%、±30%和±15%范围内准确预测了81%、57%和33%的GFR。:在SCI患者中,使用胱抑素C而非肌酐的2012年CKD-EPI CysC方程是所测试的六个方程中估算SCI患者GFR最准确的方程。