Suppr超能文献

运动性完全性脊髓损伤患者肾功能评估——胱抑素 C 作为一种准确的单一标志物。

Assessment of renal function in persons with motor complete spinal cord injury-cystatin C as an accurate single marker.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.

Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2024 Jun;62(6):295-299. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-00973-y. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort.

AIM

To show that Cystatin C is an accurate single marker to estimate GFR in motor complete persons with SCI.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if Cystatin C is an accurate for estimating GFR in persons with SCI with no preserved motor power. To study if use of Serum creatinine for estimation of GFR in this population significantly overestimates GFR, thereby inaccurate.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital and Medical College, Vellore, South India.

METHODS

30 persons with SCI (ASIA A and B) fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited. Serum Creatinine and Serum Cystatin C values were obtained, and eGFR was calculated based on available formulae. 24-h urine for urine creatinine clearance-based eGFR was used as a reference value.

RESULTS

Analysis with a Bland-Atman plot showed that eGFR estimated with Serum Cystatin C was more accurate than Serum Creatinine, using 24-h urine creatinine as a reference value. eGFR using Serum Creatinine significantly overestimated GFR by over 50.6%. Estimated GFR using Serum Cystatin C showed a meager mean difference of 0.5% from the reference 24-h urine creatinine clearance (mean difference of -2.56%).

CONCLUSION

Serum Cystatin C is a much more accurate marker for estimating GFR in SCI, compared to serum Creatinine which overestimates GFR.

摘要

研究设计

观察性队列研究。

目的

证明胱抑素 C 是一种准确的单一标志物,可用于估计完全性运动神经元损伤(SCI)患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)。

目标

评估胱抑素 C 是否可准确估计无保留运动能力的 SCI 患者的 GFR。研究血清肌酐用于该人群 GFR 估计是否显著高估 GFR,从而导致不准确。

地点

印度南部 Vellore 的三级护理医院和医学院。

方法

招募了 30 名符合纳入标准的 SCI 患者(ASIA A 和 B)。获取血清肌酐和血清胱抑素 C 值,并根据现有公式计算 eGFR。使用 24 小时尿液肌酐清除率作为参考值的 eGFR。

结果

通过 Bland-Atman 图分析显示,使用血清胱抑素 C 估计的 eGFR 比使用 24 小时尿液肌酐作为参考值的血清肌酐更准确。使用血清肌酐估计的 eGFR 显著高估了 GFR,超过了 50.6%。使用血清胱抑素 C 估计的 eGFR 与参考 24 小时尿液肌酐清除率相比,平均差异仅为 0.5%(平均差异为-2.56%)。

结论

与高估 GFR 的血清肌酐相比,血清胱抑素 C 是一种更准确的估计 SCI 患者 GFR 的标志物。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验