• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of internet educational websites on tobacco cessation: A content analysis.戒烟相关互联网教育网站分析:一项内容分析。
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 22;13:822. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146843.2. eCollection 2024.
2
IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.下腔静脉滤器 - 评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101695. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
4
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
5
Content analysis of patient material resources on the internet for oral cancer-An exploratory study.互联网上口腔癌患者资源的内容分析——一项探索性研究。
Indian J Cancer. 2021 Oct-Dec;58(4):567-572. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_464_19.
6
Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?加拿大更年期激素疗法在线健康信息的质量与可读性:我们的患者在阅读什么?
Menopause. 2021 Dec 13;29(1):54-62. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001881.
7
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.基于网络的阿拉伯语假牙卫生健康信息的质量与可读性:一项信息流行病学研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):956-960.
9
Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的资源经常提供关于术前禁食的不准确和过时的建议:一项系统综述。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1463-1468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001590.
10
Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.基于网络的 COVID-19 阿拉伯文健康信息的质量和可读性:一项信息流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10218-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-Based Information on the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence for Oral Health Professionals: Analysis of English-Written Websites.面向口腔健康专业人员的基于网络的烟草依赖治疗信息:英文网站分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 20;19(10):e349. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8174.
2
[Information quality in general public French-speaking websites dedicated to oral cancer detection].[致力于口腔癌检测的法语公众网站的信息质量]
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;118(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2016.10.003. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.成人正畸:互联网信息的质量评估
J Orthod. 2016 Sep;43(3):186-92. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1194599. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
4
Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.关于胸痛症状的互联网网站显示出内容和质量高度可变。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;23(10):1146-1152. doi: 10.1111/acem.13039. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.基于网络的口腔白斑治疗信息——质量与可读性。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Sep;45(8):617-20. doi: 10.1111/jop.12459. Epub 2016 May 28.
6
The use of health related quality of life data to produce information sheets for patients with head and neck cancer.使用与健康相关的生活质量数据为头颈癌患者制作信息表。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Jul;97(5):359-63. doi: 10.1308/003588415X14181254789448.
7
Unmet information needs and clinical characteristics in patients with precancerous oral lesions.口腔癌前病变患者未满足的信息需求及临床特征
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):911-9. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12368. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.全球、地区和国家按年龄、性别划分的 240 种死因的全死因和特定死因死亡率,1990-2013 年:2013 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
9
Available web-based teaching resources for health care professionals on screening for oral cancer.可供医疗保健专业人员使用的基于网络的口腔癌筛查教学资源。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Mar 1;20(2):e144-9. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20163.
10
Content, quality, and readability of website information on dental care for patients with cancer.癌症患者牙科护理网站信息的内容、质量和可读性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Jul;118(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

戒烟相关互联网教育网站分析:一项内容分析。

Analysis of internet educational websites on tobacco cessation: A content analysis.

作者信息

Avinash B R, Chengappa Kaveri, Shenoy Ramya, Rao Ashwini, Pai Mithun, Rajesh G

机构信息

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Infodemics, Institute for child health Policy , University of Florida., Florida, Florida, USA.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Nov 22;13:822. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146843.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.146843.2
PMID:39620154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11607478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been significant changes in the lifestyles of individuals in the past few decades, which has led to increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. Both smoking and chewing forms of tobacco are highly prevalent, especially in India, and are implicated as causes of diseases, including oropharyngeal carcinomas. Effective tobacco cessation techniques and sources can help overcome addiction and reduce the disease burden in society. The aim was to evaluate the quality and readability of contents of various sources on an internet website about tobacco cessation.

OBJECTIVES

i) To evaluate the readability of internet content (Google) regarding tobacco cessation using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests and the quality of internet content (Google) by using the JAMA benchmark, HONcode and DISCERN questionnaire.

METHODS

A content review was employed to screen the content of the Google search engine for educational tobacco cessation websites, and the top 50 websites were selected according to criteria and reviewed by two reviewers. The readability of the internet content (Google) regarding tobacco cessation was evaluated using Flesch-Kincaid readability tests. The quality of the screened sites was evaluated by using the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) benchmark, HONcode (The Health on the Net Code of Conduct) and DISCERN (Discerning the Quality of Information for Choosing Treatments) questionnaire, and the readability and quality of the screened websites were correlated using the above instruments.

RESULTS

FK readability ease was found to be 49% standard and 30% easy. The FK grade test found that 33% of the content could be easily understood by < 5 grade. All 4 JAMA benchmarks were met by 23% of websites, and authorship was the least fulfilled criterion. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between FK ease score and FK grade score.

CONCLUSIONS

The Read-ability Ease and Read-ability Grade Levels of the websites related to tobacco cessation were not standard, and few websites fulfilled the JAMA benchmarks and had HONcode certification.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,个人的生活方式发生了重大变化,这导致全球发病率和死亡率上升。吸烟和嚼烟形式在全球都极为普遍,尤其是在印度,并且被认为是包括口咽癌在内的多种疾病的病因。有效的戒烟技巧和资源有助于克服烟瘾并减轻社会的疾病负担。本研究旨在评估一个关于戒烟的互联网网站上各种资源内容的质量和可读性。

目的

i)使用弗莱什-金凯德可读性测试评估互联网内容(谷歌)关于戒烟的可读性,并使用《美国医学会杂志》基准、健康网络准则(HONcode)和辨别问卷评估互联网内容(谷歌)的质量。

方法

采用内容审查法,在谷歌搜索引擎中筛选教育性戒烟网站的内容,根据标准选择排名前50的网站并由两名评审员进行评审。使用弗莱什-金凯德可读性测试评估互联网内容(谷歌)关于戒烟的可读性。通过使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准、健康网络准则(HONcode)和辨别问卷(辨别治疗选择信息的质量)评估筛选出的网站的质量,并使用上述工具对筛选出的网站的可读性和质量进行相关性分析。

结果

发现弗莱什-金凯德可读性易读性为49%标准和30%易读。弗莱什-金凯德年级测试发现,33%的内容五年级及以下的人能够轻松理解。23%的网站符合所有4项《美国医学会杂志》基准,作者身份是最不符合的标准。相关性分析显示,弗莱什-金凯德易读性得分与弗莱什-金凯德年级得分之间存在显著关联。

结论

与戒烟相关的网站的可读性易读性和可读性年级水平不达标,很少有网站符合《美国医学会杂志》基准并获得健康网络准则认证。