• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型遗传性心脏病知识量表的表面效度和核心概念评估:一项试点研究。

Evaluation of face validity and core concepts of a novel knowledge scale for inherited heart disease: A pilot study.

作者信息

Christian Susan, Dzwiniel Tara, Baker Amy, Biesecker Barbara, Borle Kennedy, Mostafavi Roya, Slamon Jill, Wand Hannah, Yeates Laura

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Genetics and Genomics, Alberta Precision Labs, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1995. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1995. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1995
PMID:39620251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11866733/
Abstract

The rising demand for genetic counseling has prompted the implementation of various innovative service delivery models, such as patient webinars, videos, chatbots, and the integration of genetic testing into mainstream healthcare. To ensure patients receive adequate information for informed decision-making, validated measures to assess these models are essential but currently limited in the setting of inherited heart disease. We aimed to develop and initiate validation of a cardiac knowledge scale, as part of the Multidimensional Model of Informed Choice measure, to assess whether patients (probands and family members) with inherited cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and aortopathies are provided with sufficient knowledge to make informed decisions about genetic testing. Content expert genetic counselors identified eight core concepts addressed during genetic counseling sessions; from these, eight true/false knowledge questions were created. Questions were reviewed by 22 international cardiac genetics counselors with additional changes made. Initial validation steps of the knowledge scale were conducted at two sites: the Edmonton Medical Genetic Clinic, University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada, and the Genetic Heart Disease Clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia. Face validity was evaluated through nine patient interviews, resulting in minor revisions to four questions and major revisions to one question. An additional five patient interviews were conducted to evaluate the revised questions. The core concepts addressed in each question were further evaluated in the context of patient decision-making about genetic testing. All participants described the eight concepts as either helpful or essential in their decision-making process. The cardiac knowledge scale is a promising measure created to evaluate the informed choice of patients and their families affected by an inherited heart condition. The next step of validation includes trialing the cardiac knowledge scale with a real-world sample of patients deciding about genetic testing for inherited heart disease.

摘要

对遗传咨询需求的不断增加促使了各种创新服务提供模式的实施,如患者网络研讨会、视频、聊天机器人,以及将基因检测整合到主流医疗保健中。为确保患者获得足够信息以做出明智决策,评估这些模式的有效措施至关重要,但目前在遗传性心脏病领域有限。我们旨在开发并启动一项心脏知识量表的验证,作为知情选择多维模型测量的一部分,以评估患有遗传性心肌病、心律失常和主动脉病变的患者(先证者及其家庭成员)是否获得了足够的知识来就基因检测做出明智决策。内容专家遗传咨询师确定了遗传咨询会议中涉及的八个核心概念;据此创建了八个是非知识问题。22名国际心脏遗传学咨询师对问题进行了审查并做了进一步修改。知识量表的初步验证步骤在两个地点进行:加拿大埃德蒙顿阿尔伯塔大学医院的埃德蒙顿医学遗传诊所,以及澳大利亚悉尼皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院的遗传性心脏病诊所。通过对九名患者的访谈评估表面效度,对四个问题进行了小修改,对一个问题进行了大修改。又进行了五次患者访谈以评估修改后的问题。在患者关于基因检测的决策背景下,进一步评估了每个问题中涉及的核心概念。所有参与者都将这八个概念描述为在他们的决策过程中有用或必不可少。心脏知识量表是一项有前景的测量工具,旨在评估受遗传性心脏病影响的患者及其家属的知情选择。验证的下一步包括在决定进行遗传性心脏病基因检测的真实患者样本中试用心脏知识量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/751b51fb404d/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/4fcd1769ee4e/JGC4-34-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/93bfaf43331f/JGC4-34-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/94548ff5fd09/JGC4-34-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/68329efc2fe1/JGC4-34-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/774a905527d4/JGC4-34-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/4876499b99b5/JGC4-34-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/751b51fb404d/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/4fcd1769ee4e/JGC4-34-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/93bfaf43331f/JGC4-34-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/94548ff5fd09/JGC4-34-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/68329efc2fe1/JGC4-34-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/774a905527d4/JGC4-34-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/4876499b99b5/JGC4-34-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d48/11866733/751b51fb404d/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of face validity and core concepts of a novel knowledge scale for inherited heart disease: A pilot study.一种新型遗传性心脏病知识量表的表面效度和核心概念评估:一项试点研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1995. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1995. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Prenatal genetic carrier testing using triple disease screening.采用三联疾病筛查进行产前基因携带者检测。
JAMA. 1997 Oct 15;278(15):1268-72.
3
Genetics and Personal Insurance: the Perspectives of Canadian Cancer Genetic Counselors.遗传学与个人保险:加拿大癌症遗传咨询师的观点
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):1022-36. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9841-9. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.脆性 X 综合征(FXS)知识量表的制定:为 FXS 人群携带者筛查制定一种经过改良的多维知情选择衡量方法。
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):69-80. doi: 10.1111/hex.12009. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
5
Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions.在进行乳腺癌易感性遗传咨询前使用教育性计算机程序:对咨询 session 的时长和内容的影响 。(注:这里“session”结合语境可理解为咨询环节、咨询时段等,但直接保留英文更准确传达原文意思,因为中文里没有完全对应的简洁词汇)
Genet Med. 2005 Apr;7(4):221-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000159905.13125.86.
6
Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.印度一家多学科遗传性心脏病诊所患者的综合基因检测结果。
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jul-Aug;76(4):260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
7
Supporting Patient Autonomy and Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Testing.支持产前基因检测中的患者自主性和知情决策。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):a036509. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036509.
8
A tailored approach towards informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对遗传性心脏疾病风险亲属的定制告知方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e025660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025660.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Where is the "counseling" in prenatal genetic counseling?产前遗传咨询中的“咨询”在哪里?
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jul;124:108278. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108278. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The development and face validity of the music therapy sensory instrument for cognition, consciousness, and awareness (MuSICCA).用于认知、意识和觉知的音乐治疗感官工具(MuSICCA)的开发及表面效度。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 6;16:1441178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1441178. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Are disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) used in cardiogenetics? A systematic review.在心脏遗传学中是否使用了特定疾病的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)?一项系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jun;32(6):607-618. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01510-w. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Use of a chatbot to increase uptake of cascade genetic testing.利用聊天机器人提高级联基因检测的利用率。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1219-1230. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1592. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Cardiology clinic patient attitudes toward and potential personal utility of genetic testing: Findings from a unique multiracial clinical sample.
心脏病学诊所患者对基因检测的态度和潜在的个人效用:来自独特的多种族临床样本的发现。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug;31(4):989-997. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1573. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
4
IMPACT webinars: Improving Patient Access to genetic Counselling and Testing using webinars-the Alberta experience with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.IMPACT网络研讨会:利用网络研讨会改善患者获得基因咨询和检测的机会——艾伯塔省肥厚型心肌病的经验
J Community Genet. 2022 Feb;13(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00564-x. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Development and Evaluation of Decision Aids to Guide Families' Predictive Testing Choices for Children at Risk for Arrhythmia or Cardiomyopathy.指导有患心律失常或心肌病风险儿童的家庭进行预测性检测选择的决策辅助工具的开发和评估。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Oct;37(10):1586-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.患者对不同适应症中意义未明变异的看法。
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00434-7. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Decisional Conflict Scale Findings among Patients and Surrogates Making Health Decisions: Part II of an Anniversary Review.决策冲突量表在患者和代理人进行健康决策中的应用:周年回顾的第二部分。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):315-326. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19851346. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Perceptions of genetic variant reclassification in patients with inherited cardiac disease.遗传性心脏病患者对基因突变再分类的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul;27(7):1134-1142. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0377-6. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
The impact of cardiovascular genetic counseling on patient empowerment.心血管遗传咨询对患者赋权的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):570-577. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1050. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.