Ebert W Miro, Jost Leonardo, Jansen Petra, Stevanovski Biljana, Voyer Daniel
Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Bavaria, Germany.
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1204-1216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02602-4. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
An experimental study by Hyun and Luck suggests that object working memory, but not spatial working memory, is employed during mental rotation. In contrast, correlational research points to the relevance of spatial working memory in mental rotation. Considering these somewhat conflicting results and the fact that a small sample was acquired in the study of Hyun and Luck, a replication of their study was conducted. Additionally, potential sex effects were explored. We collected (usable) data from 213 individuals across two experiments. All participants performed a mental-rotation task alone, a working-memory task alone, and both tasks concurrently. We expected greater rotation-dependent interference between tasks when the working memory task concerned object features (Experiment 1) than when it concerned spatial locations (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, dual-task interference was observed in working-memory accuracy. In Experiment 2, there were interference effects in both mental rotation accuracy and working-memory accuracy. However, interference did not differ between experiments. Moreover, interference was not rotation dependent in either of the experiments. Thus, we could not replicate the findings of Hyun and Luck. No sex differences were found in exploratory analyses. The general interference effects found in this study may reflect the involvement of visual working memory in the processing and decision-making stages of the mental rotation of letters. This study underscores the need for further research to fully understand the role of visual working memory in mental rotation, especially with more complex stimuli.
贤和勒克的一项实验研究表明,在心理旋转过程中使用的是客体工作记忆,而非空间工作记忆。相比之下,相关性研究指出空间工作记忆与心理旋转相关。考虑到这些有些相互矛盾的结果,以及贤和勒克的研究中样本量较小这一事实,我们对他们的研究进行了重复。此外,还探讨了潜在的性别效应。我们在两个实验中收集了213名个体的(可用)数据。所有参与者分别完成了一项心理旋转任务、一项工作记忆任务,以及同时完成这两项任务。我们预计,当工作记忆任务涉及客体特征时(实验1),任务之间与旋转相关的干扰会比涉及空间位置时(实验2)更大。在实验1中,观察到了工作记忆准确性方面的双重任务干扰。在实验2中,心理旋转准确性和工作记忆准确性方面均存在干扰效应。然而,两个实验中的干扰并无差异。此外,在任何一个实验中,干扰都不依赖于旋转。因此,我们无法重复贤和勒克的研究结果。在探索性分析中未发现性别差异。本研究中发现的一般干扰效应可能反映了视觉工作记忆在字母心理旋转的加工和决策阶段中的参与。本研究强调需要进一步开展研究,以全面了解视觉工作记忆在心理旋转中的作用,尤其是对于更复杂刺激的情况。