Hu Li, Yang Zhoutian, Yang Zhenyun, Peng Wei, Tang Xiang, Ye Zhiwei, Wang Juncheng, Fu Yizhen, Hu Dandan, Chen Minshan, Zhang Yaojun, Chen Jinbin
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hepatol Int. 2024 Dec 2. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10757-4.
Regorafenib is the recommended second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Our study aimed to assess the effect of transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib on treatment outcomes in uHCC patients.
In this retrospective study, patients were categorized into prompt transition group (PT group) or delayed transition group (DT group) based on the transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib following the first or subsequent occurrence of progressive disease during first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
There were 85 and 122 patients in the PT and DT groups, respectively. The PT group demonstrated significantly better median PFS [4.5 months (95% CI 3.8-6.0) vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8-4.1); HR 0.641; 95% CI 0.478-0.859; p = 0.003], ORR (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), DCR (69.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.049), and median OS [17.5 months (95% CI 13.4-not reached) vs. 10.4 months (95% CI 7.9-15.6); HR 0.613; 92% CI 0.432-0.871, p = 0.006] compared to the DT group. Moreover, the overall safety profiles were comparable between groups.
The prompt transition to second-line therapy with regorafenib following first-line treatment progression suggests better treatment outcomes and potentially longer survival than in patients who delay the transition to second-line therapy.
瑞戈非尼是不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)推荐的二线治疗药物。我们的研究旨在评估uHCC患者一线治疗进展后转换为瑞戈非尼二线治疗的时机对治疗结果的影响。
在这项回顾性研究中,根据一线治疗期间首次或后续出现疾病进展后转换为瑞戈非尼二线治疗的时机,将患者分为快速转换组(PT组)或延迟转换组(DT组)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
PT组和DT组分别有85例和122例患者。与DT组相比,PT组的中位PFS显著更长[4.5个月(95%CI 3.8 - 6.0)vs. 3.4个月(95%CI 2.8 - 4.1);HR 0.641;95%CI 0.478 - 0.859;p = 0.003],ORR更高(24.7% vs. 9.8%,p = 0.007),DCR更高(69.4% vs. 54.9%,p = 0.049),中位OS更长[17.5个月(95%CI 13.4 - 未达到)vs. 10.4个月(95%CI 7.9 - 15.6);HR 0.613;92%CI 0.432 - 0.871,p = 0.006]。此外,两组的总体安全性相当。
一线治疗进展后迅速转换为瑞戈非尼二线治疗的患者,与延迟转换二线治疗的患者相比,显示出更好的治疗结果和可能更长的生存期。