Pachankis John E, Clark Kirsty A
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; email:
Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2025 May;21(1):1-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-022014. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Research on the disparity in common mental health problems borne by sexual minority individuals has entered a stage of increasing theoretical complexity. Indeed, such a substantial disparity is likely not determined by a singular cause and therefore warrants diverse etiological perspectives tested with increasingly rigorous methodologies. The research landscape is made even more complex by the constant and rapid shift in the ways in which sexual minority people understand and characterize their own identities and experiences. This review introduces readers to this complexity by summarizing the historical legacy of research on the sexual orientation disparity in mental health, describing five contemporary theoretical explanations for this disparity and their supporting evidence, and suggesting theoretically informed interventions for reducing this disparity. Last, we offer an agenda for future research to accurately model the complexity of the pathways and solutions to the disproportionately poorer mental health of sexual minority populations.
对性少数群体所面临的常见心理健康问题差异的研究已进入理论复杂性不断增加的阶段。事实上,如此大的差异可能并非由单一原因决定,因此需要用日益严谨的方法来检验多种病因学观点。性少数群体理解和描述自身身份及经历的方式不断快速变化,这使得研究情况更加复杂。本综述通过总结心理健康方面性取向差异研究的历史遗产、描述对这种差异的五种当代理论解释及其支持证据,并提出从理论角度出发减少这种差异的干预措施,向读者介绍这种复杂性。最后,我们提供了一个未来研究议程,以准确模拟性少数群体心理健康状况较差比例过高的途径和解决方案的复杂性。