• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机扫描是当代残肢测量技术的一种可靠且准确的替代方法。

Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques.

作者信息

Walters Sam, Metcalfe Benjamin, Twiste Martin, Seminati Elena, Bailey Nicola Y

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom.

Bath Institute for the Augmented Human, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0313542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313542. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0313542
PMID:39621584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11611122/
Abstract

Monitoring the volume and shape of residual limbs post-amputation is necessary to achieve optimal socket fit and determine overall limb health, yet contemporary clinical measurement techniques show high variance between measures. Three-dimensional scanning presents an opportunity for improved accuracy and reliability of residual limb measurements, however, three-dimensional scanners remain prohibitively expensive. A cost-effective alternative is the use of software that can utilise the photographs of modern smartphone cameras to create geometrically accurate scans. Whilst several studies have investigated the potential of privately developed photogrammetry algorithms for capturing residual limbs with clinical accuracy, none to the authors knowledge have explored commercially available software to do the same. Three applications were tested, namely Polycam, Luma, and Meshroom, to determine if they could produce clinically acceptable results. Scans of ten residual limbs were created using both smartphone technology and a reference structured-light scanner (Artec EVA), against which the validity and reliability of the resulting limb models were assessed using the Bland-Altman method and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, respectively. Polycam and Luma achieved both Pearson Coefficients and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients of 0.999, and Coefficients of Variation of 1.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Volume reliability coefficients were 58.3 ml and 70.0 ml respectively for Polycam and Luma, whereas Meshroom failed to meet any of the criteria for clinical suitability, with a repeatability coefficient of 790.3 ml. Both Polycam and Luma exhibit sufficient accuracy and reliability to be considered for clinical volume measurements.

摘要

截肢后监测残肢的体积和形状对于实现最佳的假肢适配以及确定整体肢体健康状况至关重要,然而当代临床测量技术显示测量结果之间存在很大差异。三维扫描为提高残肢测量的准确性和可靠性提供了契机,但是三维扫描仪仍然价格昂贵得令人望而却步。一种经济高效的替代方法是使用能够利用现代智能手机摄像头拍摄的照片来创建几何精确扫描的软件。虽然有几项研究调查了私人开发的摄影测量算法在临床精度下捕捉残肢的潜力,但据作者所知,尚未有研究探索使用商业可用软件来做同样的事情。测试了三款应用程序,即Polycam、Luma和Meshroom,以确定它们是否能产生临床可接受的结果。使用智能手机技术和参考结构光扫描仪(Artec EVA)对十个残肢进行了扫描,并分别使用布兰德-奥特曼方法和组内相关系数评估了所得肢体模型的有效性和可靠性。Polycam和Luma的皮尔逊系数和组内相关系数均达到0.999,变异系数分别为1.1%和1.4%。Polycam和Luma的体积可靠性系数分别为58.3毫升和70.0毫升,而Meshroom未能满足任何临床适用性标准,其重复性系数为790.3毫升。Polycam和Luma都表现出足够的准确性和可靠性,可用于临床体积测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/e717a7d7ba85/pone.0313542.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/b51aacc86234/pone.0313542.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/5f6a50e41a5a/pone.0313542.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/c9f4704c1c5f/pone.0313542.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/f91629c2abea/pone.0313542.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/d03dd90a12cc/pone.0313542.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/d1ee414fe292/pone.0313542.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/924f16f9c1af/pone.0313542.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/8eda2ca0ccda/pone.0313542.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/301d0da46149/pone.0313542.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/e717a7d7ba85/pone.0313542.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/b51aacc86234/pone.0313542.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/5f6a50e41a5a/pone.0313542.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/c9f4704c1c5f/pone.0313542.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/f91629c2abea/pone.0313542.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/d03dd90a12cc/pone.0313542.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/d1ee414fe292/pone.0313542.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/924f16f9c1af/pone.0313542.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/8eda2ca0ccda/pone.0313542.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/301d0da46149/pone.0313542.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c109/11611122/e717a7d7ba85/pone.0313542.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques.智能手机扫描是当代残肢测量技术的一种可靠且准确的替代方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0313542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313542. eCollection 2024.
2
Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models.一种用于评估截肢者残肢模型形状和体积的新型3D扫描仪的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184498. eCollection 2017.
3
The Use of Smartphone Photogrammetry to Digitise Transtibial Sockets: Optimisation of Method and Quantitative Evaluation of Suitability.使用智能手机摄影测量术对胫骨假肢接受腔进行数字化:方法优化和适配性的定量评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;21(24):8405. doi: 10.3390/s21248405.
4
Reliability and validity of the iSense optical scanner for measuring volume of transtibial residual limb models.用于测量经胫骨残肢模型体积的iSense光学扫描仪的可靠性和有效性。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Apr;43(2):213-220. doi: 10.1177/0309364618806038. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.一种用于对假肢接受腔内部进行数字化的智能手机摄影测量方法。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Apr;41(2):210-214. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664150. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Reliability of three different methods for assessing amputee residuum shape and volume: 3D scanners vs. circumferential measurements.评估截肢残肢形状和体积的三种不同方法的可靠性:3D 扫描仪与周径测量。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Aug 1;46(4):327-334. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000105. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
A comparative evaluation of photogrammetry software programs and conventional impression techniques for the fabrication of nasal maxillofacial prostheses.用于制作鼻颌面修复体的摄影测量软件程序与传统印模技术的比较评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.027. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
8
Frugal 3D scanning using smartphones provides an accessible framework for capturing the external ear.使用智能手机进行低成本3D扫描为获取外耳提供了一个便捷的框架。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Nov;74(11):3066-3072. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.131. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Clinical usability, reliability, and repeatability of noncontact scanners in measuring residual limb volume in persons with transtibial amputation.非接触式扫描仪在测量经胫截肢者残肢体积中的临床可用性、可靠性和可重复性。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Apr 1;46(2):164-169. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000087.
10
Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging.手持式结构光扫描仪和静态体视摄影系统在面部三维表面成像中的可靠性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 8;14(1):8172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57370-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of three different methods for assessing amputee residuum shape and volume: 3D scanners vs. circumferential measurements.评估截肢残肢形状和体积的三种不同方法的可靠性:3D 扫描仪与周径测量。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Aug 1;46(4):327-334. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000105. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Usefulness of smartphone use among surgeons in clinical practice during the pandemic of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间外科医生在临床实践中使用智能手机的效用:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 25;21(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01563-1.
3
Comfort and function remain key factors in upper limb prosthetic abandonment: findings of a scoping review.
舒适性和功能性仍然是上肢假肢放弃的关键因素:范围综述的结果。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Nov;16(8):821-830. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1738567. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Reliability and validity of the iSense optical scanner for measuring volume of transtibial residual limb models.用于测量经胫骨残肢模型体积的iSense光学扫描仪的可靠性和有效性。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Apr;43(2):213-220. doi: 10.1177/0309364618806038. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors' experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals.临床实践中的智能手机:都柏林两家儿科教学医院医生的经验
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Aug;187(3):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
6
Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models.一种用于评估截肢者残肢模型形状和体积的新型3D扫描仪的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184498. eCollection 2017.
7
A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.一种用于对假肢接受腔内部进行数字化的智能手机摄影测量方法。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Apr;41(2):210-214. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664150. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
8
Registering methodology for imaging and analysis of residual-limb shape after transtibial amputation.经胫骨截肢术后残肢形状成像与分析的登记方法。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(2):207-18. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0272.
9
Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality.我们能在临床实践中信赖智能手机摄像头的使用吗?非专业人士对其图像质量的评估。
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Nov;21(11):887-92. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0221. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
10
Hands-off and hands-on casting consistency of amputee below knee sockets using magnetic resonance imaging.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 19;2013:486146. doi: 10.1155/2013/486146. eCollection 2013.