Zhao Yuhao, Wang Yajuan, Li Yi, Song Chao, Pan Pinhua
Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Key Clinical Specialty, Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 2;18(12):e0012701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012701. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a promising diagnostic tool for pathogens diagnosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the application of NGS-based antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcomes in severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) patients with empiric antimicrobial therapy failure.
We performed a multi-center, retrospective cohort of SCAP patients with initial empiric therapy failure. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to obtain balance among the baseline variables in NGS group (n = 82) and conventional group (n = 82). We compared the diagnostic performance of NGS with conventional microbial culture. We also compared the impact of NGS-based antimicrobial therapy on the prognosis of patients with empirical antimicrobial therapy failure.
The positive rate of NGS was higher than that of conventional pathogen detection methods (92.6% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.001). Compared to the conventional group, the NGS group has a considerably higher modifications rate of antibiotic treatment (73.2% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.015). The mortality of NGS group was significantly lower than that of conventional group (28.0% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.034). Moreover, the detection of NGS can significantly shorten the ventilation time (P = 0.046), and reduce the antibiotic cost (P = 0.026).
NGS is a valuable tool for microbial identification of SCAP patient with initial empiric therapy failure.
下一代测序(NGS)是一种很有前景的病原体诊断工具。本研究旨在评估基于NGS的抗菌治疗对经验性抗菌治疗失败的重症社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者临床结局的应用效果。
我们对初始经验性治疗失败的SCAP患者进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。采用倾向评分(PS)匹配法使NGS组(n = 82)和传统组(n = 82)的基线变量达到平衡。我们比较了NGS与传统微生物培养的诊断性能。我们还比较了基于NGS的抗菌治疗对经验性抗菌治疗失败患者预后的影响。
NGS的阳性率高于传统病原体检测方法(92.6%对74.7%,P = 0.001)。与传统组相比,NGS组抗生素治疗的调整率显著更高(73.2%对54.9%,P = 0.015)。NGS组的死亡率显著低于传统组(28.0%对43.9%,P = 本034)。此外,NGS检测可显著缩短通气时间(P = 0.046),并降低抗生素费用(P = 0.026)。
NGS是对初始经验性治疗失败的SCAP患者进行微生物鉴定的有价值工具。