Tregnago Claudia, Benetton Maddalena, Ries Rhonda E, Peplinski Jack H, Alonzo Todd A, Stirewalt Derek, Othus Megan, Duployez Nicolas, Sonneveld Edwin, Abrahamsson Jonas, Fogelstrand Linda, von Neuhoff Nils, Hasle Henrik, Reinhardt Dirk, Meshinchi Soheil, Locatelli Franco, Pigazzi Martina
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Onco-hematology Lab and Clinic, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Translational Sciences and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;43(8):972-984. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01715. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Several genomic subsets of mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.
Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the variants was studied.
Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D 86% for type non-D, = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.
The evaluation of specific genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.
已鉴定出具有不同序列的几种基因突变基因组亚组(A 型、B 型、D 型等)。尽管存在分子异质性,但这些突变总体预示着更有利的结果,然而不同基因组亚组的生物学特性和预后影响尚未得到广泛研究。在这项多中心研究中,我们调查了基因突变类型对患者预后的影响,并探究了不同亚型的潜在生物学特性。
在多个儿科合作试验(AIEOP、BFM、ELAM02、NOPHO、DCOG 和 COG 试验)或成人(SWOG)试验中登记的 4000 多名患者中,选择了 348 名患有已知基因突变类型且有可用预后数据的儿科急性髓系白血病(AML)患者和 75 名成人 AML 患者进行本研究。将多种基因突变变体与总生存期(OS)和无事件生存期的概率相关联。研究了基因突变变体的核定位和翻译效率。
基于基因突变类型对临床结果的评估表明,A 型、B 型和其他罕见变体的患者预后同样良好,而 D 型患者的预后明显更差(D 型患者的 OS 为 63%,非 D 型患者为 86%,P = 0.005)。多变量分析证实 D 型是与较差 OS 相关的独立预后因素(风险比为 3;P = 0.005)。在体外,我们证明,在 D 型与 A 型同义变体中,密码子最优性在决定基因表达水平和翻译效率方面起主要作用,这导致更多的基因突变信使核糖核酸(mRNA)和蛋白质表达,介导特殊的线粒体基因表达。
对特定基因突变类型的评估确定,D 型突变的 AML 患者与较差的预后显著相关,这表明应将 D 型病例重新分类为高风险组。