Mantica G, Chierigo F, Białek Ł, Madec F X, Frankiewicz M, Verla W, Redmond E J, Rosenbaum C M, Cocci A, Campos-Juanatey F, Oszczudłowski M, Adamowicz J, Terrone C, Vetterlein M W
Departamento de Ciencias Quirúrgicas y Diagnósticas Integradas (DISC), Universidad de Génova, Génova, Italy; IRCCS Hospital Policlínico San Martino, Génova, Italy; Grupo de Trabajo de Urología Reconstructiva y Trauma Urológico de la Sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos - Asociación Europea de Urología, The netherlands.
Grupo de Trabajo de Urología Reconstructiva y Trauma Urológico de la Sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos - Asociación Europea de Urología, The netherlands; Departamento de Urología, Centro de Estudios de Posgrado de Medicina, Varsovia, Poland.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Jan-Feb;49(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
The aim of this systematic review is to offer a comprehensive view of the current use of robotic surgery for the treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contractures.
A systematic review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and NCBI PubMed, Embase databases in December 2023. Keywords used were "robotic" and "robotic-assisted" combined with "urethroplasty", "urethral stricture", and "bladder neck contracture". All papers published after 2000, concerning studies conducted on humans for urethral strictures and bladder neck contractures managed with robotic surgery were considered for the review. Only procedures involving a direct approach to urethra/bladder neck and/or graft harvesting for urethroplasty have been included.
A total of 275 articles were evaluated after the strategy search and only 11 articles were considered eligible for the final analysis. The studies included a series of between a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 104 patients, for a total of 203 patients. The robotic surgery was performed mainly for the treatment of bladder neck contracture and posterior urethra. In some reports, the robotic system was used for graft harvesting, subsequently used with an open perineal technique. The follow-up presented in the different studies is very heterogeneous. However, most studies have high success rates, with recurrence and redo surgery rates generally below 20%. Likewise, post-procedure incontinence rates are low.
The outcomes presented in the literature, combined with the minimally invasive nature, suggest a possible growing role for robotic surgery in the coming years in the treatment of these diseases.
本系统评价旨在全面了解机器人手术目前在治疗尿道狭窄和膀胱颈挛缩方面的应用情况。
2023年12月通过Medline、NCBI PubMed和Embase数据库对当前文献进行了系统评价。使用的关键词为“机器人”和“机器人辅助”,并与“尿道成形术”、“尿道狭窄”和“膀胱颈挛缩”相结合。所有2000年以后发表的、关于人类使用机器人手术治疗尿道狭窄和膀胱颈挛缩的研究均纳入本评价。仅纳入涉及直接处理尿道/膀胱颈和/或为尿道成形术采集移植物的手术。
经过策略检索,共评估了275篇文章,最终仅11篇文章符合纳入分析的标准。这些研究纳入的患者数量最少为1例,最多为104例,总计203例患者。机器人手术主要用于治疗膀胱颈挛缩和后尿道。在一些报告中,机器人系统用于采集移植物,随后与开放会阴技术联合使用。不同研究中的随访情况差异很大。然而,大多数研究成功率较高,复发率和再次手术率一般低于20%。同样,术后尿失禁率也较低。
文献报道的结果,结合其微创性,表明机器人手术在未来几年治疗这些疾病中可能发挥越来越重要的作用。