Nebsbjerg Mette Amalie, Bomholt Katrine Bjørnshave, Vestergaard Claus Høstrup, Christensen Morten Bondo, Huibers Linda
Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, 45 24647244.
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 15;11:e52301. doi: 10.2196/52301.
Many countries have introduced video consultations in primary care both inside and outside of office hours. Despite some relational and technical limitations, general practitioners (GPs) have reported the benefits of video use in the daytime as it provides faster and more flexible access to health care. Studies have indicated that video may be specifically valuable in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC), but additional information on the added value of video use is needed.
This study aimed to investigate triage GPs' perspectives on video use in GP-led telephone triage in OOH-PC by exploring their reasons for choosing video use and its effect on triage outcome, the decision-making process, communication, and invested time.
We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among GPs performing telephone triage in the OOH-PC service in the Central Denmark Region from September 5, 2022, until December 21, 2022. The questionnaire was integrated into the electronic patient registration system as a pop-up window appearing after every third video contact. This setup automatically linked background data on the contact, patient, and GP to the questionnaire data. We used descriptive analyses to describe reasons for and effects of video use and GP evaluation, stratified by patient age.
A total of 2456 questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for video use were to assess the severity (n=1951, 79.4%), to increase the probability of self-care (n=1279, 52.1%), and to achieve greater certainty in decision-making (n=810, 33%) (multiple answers were possible for reasons of video use). In 61.9% (n=1516) of contacts, the triage GPs anticipated that the contact would have resulted in a different triage outcome if video had not been used. Use of video resulted in a downgrading of severity level in 88.3% (n=1338) of cases. Triage GPs evaluated the use of video as positive in terms of their decision-making process (n=2358, 96%), communication (n=2214, 90.1%), and invested time (n=2391, 97.3%).
Triage GPs assessed that the use of video in telephone triage did affect their triage outcome, mostly by downgrading the level of care needed. The participating triage GPs found video in OOH-PC to be of added value, particularly in communication and the decision-making process.
许多国家已在办公时间内外的基层医疗中引入了视频会诊。尽管存在一些人际关系和技术限制,但全科医生(GPs)报告了白天使用视频的好处,因为它能提供更快、更灵活的医疗服务获取途径。研究表明,视频在非工作时间基层医疗(OOH - PC)中可能具有特殊价值,但仍需要更多关于视频使用附加值的信息。
本研究旨在通过探讨分诊全科医生在OOH - PC中进行全科医生主导的电话分诊时选择使用视频的原因及其对分诊结果、决策过程、沟通和投入时间的影响,来调查他们对视频使用的看法。
我们于2022年9月5日至2022年12月21日在丹麦中部地区OOH - PC服务中进行电话分诊的全科医生中开展了一项横断面问卷调查研究。问卷作为一个弹出窗口集成到电子患者登记系统中,每三次视频联系后出现。这种设置自动将关于联系、患者和全科医生的背景数据与问卷数据关联起来。我们使用描述性分析来描述视频使用的原因、影响以及全科医生的评估,并按患者年龄分层。
共完成了2456份问卷。使用视频最常见的原因是评估严重程度(n = 1951,79.4%)、提高自我护理的可能性(n = 1279,52.1%)以及在决策中获得更大的确定性(n = 810,33%)(视频使用原因可多选)。在61.9%(n = 1516)的联系中,分诊全科医生预计如果未使用视频,该联系会导致不同的分诊结果。在88.3%(n = 1338)的病例中,使用视频导致严重程度级别降低。分诊全科医生在决策过程(n = 2358,96%)、沟通(n = 2214,90.1%)和投入时间(n = 2391,97.3%)方面对视频使用给予了积极评价。
分诊全科医生评估认为,在电话分诊中使用视频确实影响了他们的分诊结果,主要是通过降低所需护理级别。参与研究的分诊全科医生发现,OOH - PC中的视频具有附加值,特别是在沟通和决策过程中。